Talk:Noah Schnapp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

I think we should add some things regarding [his political views]

I don't think we should overlook his support of a genocide. People should be aware of one's political views, especially when said political views are a clear lack of human decency. Baddestanon (talk) 12:52, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What
WP:BLP-good sources do you suggest for what article content? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
@
reliable sources. All claims about living people must be so supported, regardless of where in Wikipedia they appear. —C.Fred (talk) 13:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Sources like [1][2] could perhaps be used for a sentence, but it needs to be in
WP:PROPORTION. Personal life section, perhaps. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
In proportion and in context. Opposition to attacks on civilians (attacks which may be duly labeled terrorist attacks, at that), does not equate to support of anything else. —C.Fred (talk) 13:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely, if we add anything, it shouldn't go outside the RS. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I added something:[3] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And I removed something:[4]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gråbergs Gråa Sång Good catch, given the source [sic] that was cited for the thing. —C.Fred (talk) 13:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
TBH, I'm fine with removing my addition too, but it's sort of ok-ish. I've been in similar discussions at Talk:Mika Tosca and Talk:Ahed Tamimi, though in the latter example the situation changed somewhat. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Showing support for Zionism is clearly not supporting genocide. If calls to boycott him have a significant impact on his career (regardless of if they are valid or not), I think it should be included. However, it seems like a lot of “criticism” in this Talk section is political and completely nonsensical. I’d wait to see if it has an impact on his career to determine if it is appropriate to include. 2600:4040:B12E:B100:914C:99A2:C2FB:C30E (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We can't be partial in a Wikipedia article,this isn't a soapbox — trust me I'm progressive and even I have to check myself before posting here 2600:8801:FB13:6B00:1027:CD0C:1EA8:297E (talk) 07:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Public debate is not personal life

@Joeyconnick and Leaky.Solar: the latest revert regarding the “Personal life” heading was made on the basis that “his opinions are part of his personal life unless he enters into the political sphere”. How is publicly voicing his support of Zionism and receiving public backlash not political? ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 10:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, "Personal life" fits well enough. The Israel-thing may have to much text per
WP:PROPORTION atm, but at least it's not glaringly awful. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:36, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
IMO, the "Public Image" section seems as a weird title and didn't fit both aspects listed under it, which is why I reverted it once, to only be "Personal life". As Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) mentioned the text fits well enough as it is now. Leaky.Solar (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The neutrality of that whole section is questionable, to say the least… 75.169.17.131 (talk) 05:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2023

NOAH SCHNAPP— a zionist. 2600:1017:B838:37FE:1C1A:F980:5527:2D5F (talk) 05:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
"change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 07:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Neutrality Tag

Hi all, I recently added the neutrality tag to the Personal Life section as there seems to be a back and forth reverting that happened recently and there seems to be a much large section reflecting his pro Israel stance, comparative to the backlash that occurred due to the Zionism stickers. I'm currently for keeping both points in the section but feel that both points should be the same size, either by shrinking or growing one of them. Leaky.Solar (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2024

Hello, I need to edit because as Noahs lawyer there is some false information in the things on your website and i need to edit them so noone can use it. Thank you Hellopookiewookiepie (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So he never was in Bridge of Spies? I liked that film, btw. More seriously, here is some recommended reading:
WP:RS, the article can be changed. We like to avoid false information if we can. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]