Talk:Northern Yuan

	Asia portal Northern Yuan is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

defunct

.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

project-independent quality rating

in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Please fix infobox

If this dynasty ended in the 1600s, why does the infobox list capitals only for the years 1368–1388? Can this be fixed? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 06:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this dynasty ended in the 1600s, why does the infobox list capitals only for the years 1368–1388? Can this be fixed? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why English-language sources tend to extend the dynasty till the 17th century (other than, I suppose, to simplify the situation). As the article itself points out, the Yuan title was abolished in 1388, and that is where Chinese historiography tends to end the Northern Yuan. Thereafter the eastern and western Mongols are treated as separate regimes. Mongolian historiography also admits that there was then a period of disunity. Double sharp (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move - discussion has run a week, no oppose !votes, no obvious policy reasons not to move. If anyone sees any then please come find me at my talk page and I'll re-open the discussion. (non-admin closure) FOARP (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 08:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Agree - Hextor26 (talk) 03:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.