Talk:Oleg Platonov

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Jewish history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: Language & literature / Science & education / Economy / History / Politics and law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force. This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force. This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force. This article is supported by the history of Russia task force. This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.

The Library of Congress has 36 titles under his nane: [1]. --Ludvikus (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high quality references. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." See

Try to Google up the gentleman in question.Lute88 (talk) 23:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See

talk) 12:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I have added half dozen legitimate citations in English for your perusal.Lute88 (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is starting to look better but there are still Russian language citations, and some of the citations are to websites that are not reliable. Please fix the citations so that they are in a format similar to that in

talk) 21:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I've ordered the Semyon Reznik book from the library so that we can verify it as a source.

As for criticisms and descriptions, let's try to keep the neutral point of view. That means reporting viewpoints without adopting them. It's OK to say that he has been described as an anti-semite. It's not so good to say he's an anti-semite.   Will Beback  talk  21:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We also need to say who has described him as such. Attribution of criticism isn't just a matter of sourcing.--Scott Mac (Doc) 21:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]