Talk:Origins of society

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

An image used in this article, File:Stonehengeorigins.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 15:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

I am tempted to propose a merger with the sociocultural evolution. This article seems to concern the very same issue, it only forks it under a more "popular" title. Thoughts? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 00:09, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is surely a truism that for anarchists the state and society have always been and always will be at odds with each other, unless one envisages a cosy state structure in which anarchists are merely tolerated and content to be so (Pamour (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2018 (UTC)).[reply]

This section gives more weight to the female-centric view than the male-centric one, in terms of number of words. --Jacob's Crackers (talk) 17:52, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]