Talk:Orlacher Bach

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 June 2016. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rivers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article needs a map.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Baden-Württemberg may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

From the geographic notability guidelines: "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdammers (talk • contribs)

@Kdammers: Right, so information beyond statistics and coordinates demonstrating there's enough verifiable content should be enough to demonstrate notability KJ ^Discuss? 00:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The German articles give Topographische Karte 1:25.000 Baden-Württemberg, als Einzelblatt Nr. 6724 Künzelsau, Nr. 6725 Gerabronn und Nr. 6824 Schwäbisch Hall as the relevant topo maps. I don't have access to them, so I can't cite. them. The German Wik on the stream seems to have two different elevations for its source. Kdammers (talk) 01:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]