Talk:Otmoor

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images ). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo. United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is there any evidence that

Why does Charlton-on-Otmoor redirect to this article? Otmoor is a large area of open land with considerable historic and ecological interest, and its article should be developed with relevant content. Charlton-on-Otmoor is a village on one edge of the moor, the article contains almost no content about the village, and it would be confusing to add any.

Charlton is the largest of the "seven towns" of Otmoor. Most of the seven already have their own articles. Charlton is the only one that has a redirect to "Otmoor" instead. Charlton deserves its own article like every other village. I propose that this redirect be deleted so that one of us can create a proper article about Charlton-on-Otmoor village. Motacilla (talk) 11:41, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know of the geology of the area? That seems like a very appropriate discussion point. RCHillyard (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]