Talk:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Glass Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Energy Start‑class

	project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Advertisement?

I didn't read this thoroughly, but I was tempted to slap an {{

Katr67 23:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply

As other editors have noted both above and with the {{

To begin with I deleted the
peacock language
of the infobox “Field of Research” parameter: “PNNL delivers leadership and advancements”.
I removed the entire “Missions and Core Capabilities” section because it was hopelessly promotional and would require a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic. A mission statement is useful as advertising and for internal focus, but it is inherently unencyclopedic. Perhaps there is something salvageable in the section, but I can’t identify it. (And although I expect it to be deleted, I moved the holograph image for now to another place.)

Other sections that need attention: