Talk:Palaeos

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 January 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance Talk:Palaeos is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Websites: Computing This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Here are some references where Palaeos is mentioned:

• Vertebrate Palaeontology
  , 3rd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd, (cited on p.10)
• G Koentges, T Matsuoka, EVOLUTION: Enhanced: Jaws of the Fates, Science Magazine, 2002 Vol. 298. no. 5592
• Nancy B. Simmons, 2005, EVOLUTION: Enhanced: An Eocene Big Bang for Bats, Science Magazine, Vol. 307. no. 5709
• Trond H. Torsvik, 2003, GEOLOGY: Enhanced: The Rodinia Jigsaw Puzzle, Science 30 May 2003: Vol. 300. no. 5624

Note that this is not an exhaustive list M Alan Kazlev 05:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Palaeos Wiki has a tricky spam problem and it would be appreciated if computer experts would help. See Spam I can't deal with Proxima Centauri (talk) 09:11, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The website currently seems to be pretty much falling apart, with the main site in a strange state of suspended reorganization and almost unnavigable, while the Wiki main page is filled with Viagra advertisements... AnonMoos (talk) 01:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They have more or less moved the site back to the original URL of palaeos.com and abandoned the wiki format.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:06, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even leaving aside the Wiki spam problems, the main site makes it very hard to find what you're interested in unless you already know the exact technical terminology and/or sequence of ancestor clades. Its interface really needs a drastic accessibility/navigability overhaul... AnonMoos (talk) 21:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And they solved this problem by moving back to the original URL.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They solved the Viagra spam problem, but don't seem to have done much about the navigability problems which make palaeos.com rather difficult to use unless you already know the relevant technical terminology in the area you're seeking information about... AnonMoos (talk) 00:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]