Talk:People's Freedom Party (Russia)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Russia: History / Politics and law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the history of Russia task force. This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force. Politics: Political parties This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Didn't PARNAS recently form an alliance with the

I added a section on it. Nikolai Romanov (talk) 16:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the current name of the party, I think a separate article for the Republican Party of Russia should created while People's Freedom Party "For Russia without Lawlessness and Corruption" should be merged into this article. Charles Essie (talk) 19:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong oppose. Do not merge because the registered party with a long history and a non-registered party have a very different status in Russia. But perhaps we will need three separate articles in the future. --
  talk) 17:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support. They ought to just have their own sections on the main PARNAS article. Nikolai Romanov (talk) 17:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing merge, given no consensus over almost 2 years. Klbrain (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does the party still have that 1 regional parliament representative that's shown in the summary box? It says on

Has the party actually dissolved itself or was it just deregistered because they're not the same thing. Charles Essie (talk) 02:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]