Talk:Progressive Social Networks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 02:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I'm a new reviewer, so would be grateful for a second opinion. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The Forbes source cited in that article says that she was "perceived to be among the most corrupt" and had been charged (though not convicted) with embezzlement. It seems obvious to me that Gordillo is corrupt, but I think we still need to cite it in the article per
WP:BLP. —Granger (talk · contribs) 18:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
@Mx. Granger: Done. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 00:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I'm still not sure that source works for this claim, as (outside the
headline) it just says that she's perceived to be corrupt, not that she actually is corrupt. But I'll leave that subtlety to others' judgement. Otherwise the article looks good. Granger (talk · contribs) 07:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]