Talk:Project Jupyter
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Categories
Please help me improve the categories of open source advocates (people) and "free and open-source software organizations" (organizations).
Added category "Free and open-source software organizations"
Removed category "Open Source Advocates" from
Happy to discuss here Spohrer (talk) 13:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
"IPython Notebook" or "IPython Notebooks"?
Sub section Jupyter Notebook:
Should it be "IPython Notebook" or "IPython Notebooks"?
--Mortense (talk) 14:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Sources
I work on d:Wikidata:Scholia. Lots of wiki people like Jupyter and I was talking with someone about Wikidata + Scholia + Jupyter. I was looking at this article and thinking about the sources. Right now, this article is in rough shape and does not cite academic sources. In Scholia somehow 5 academic sources are there and more may appear in the future. See Scholia profile of Jupyter.
Here are two I like -
- Helen Shen (5 November 2014). "Interactive notebooks: Sharing the code". Wikidata Q28851715.
- Thomas Kluyver; Benjamin Ragan-Kelley; Wikidata Q28846483
Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Information about responses
In "Media coverage", shouldn't some of the responses be summarised? --Mortense (talk) 08:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Galileo Manuscript
Why is there an image of Galileo's notebook here?
2600:1700:C280:1CF0:B5DD:E3B6:1965:8E8E (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is stated in the intro:
Project Jupyter's name is a reference to the three core programming languages supported by Jupyter, which are Julia, Python and R, and also a homage to Galileo's notebooks recording the discovery of the moons of Jupiter.
- -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 19:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
This manuscript was shown in 2022 to be fake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droodman (talk • contribs) 15:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Primary sources tag
I deleted a lot of information sourced only to primary sources, without secondary sources to assert importance, and I added new secondary source citations. Of the 25 citations, 12 are now to secondary sources. Is this sufficient to drop the primary sources tag? I have a COI (I work on JupyterLab in a professional capacity) so I will not remove it myself. White 720 (talk) 15:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)