Talk:PureScript

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Speedy keep, 5 July 2019, see discussion. delete, March 31, 2015, see discussion.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Add the following sections:

History

• Maybe rename to "History and relation to other languages"
• Mention influence by Roy, which is mentioned on https://github.com/purescript/documentation/blob/2ae4723320c3591ac33f138cd2327c9edfe2d4bf/Related-Projects.md

Roy is probably the most similar language on the list, and was a large influence on the development of PureScript. There are however, key differences in the foreign function interface, the type system and the choice of development language (Haskell vs. Javascript)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.185.74.52 (talk) 19:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply] 

Code examples

• At least a "Hello World"
• Maybe also a JavaScript FFI example, highlightling the ease of integration with existing JS-codebases/frameworks

Implementations

• Mention alternative implementations, in particular purescript-native which targets C++ as a backend instead of EcmaScript.

Applications

• Industry: Despite PureScript being a relatively young language, there are already several companys which rely on PureScript for a significant portion of their codebase. A few of the major ones would be worth mentioning here, underlining the real-world significance and strength of PureScript. Easily verifiable references:
  • Lumi: Several open-source repo maintained on their github
  • Awakesecurity: They list at least one purescript repo on their public github
  • SlamData: Several PureScript repos on their public github

Ecosystem

• documentation on pursuit
• Pulp
• Bower
• psc-package
• Editor integrations (vscode, atom, vim/emacs)

Community

• Maybe mention the discourse, github, slack channels, ...

Future Directions

• Which aspects of the language are stable, which are in the progress of being extended & improved?
• Are there any essential design-principles or philosophies that drive the evolution of the language? E.g. in C++, a central philosophy is "you should not have to pay for what you don't use"... are there any similar philosophies driving the evolution of PureScript?
• are there plans for standardization?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.185.75.42 (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The strict evaluation is clearly formulated in the documentation in the context of JS:

• "As the evaluation strategy matches JavaScript"
• "Keeping strict evaluation also means there is no need for a runtime system or overly complicated JavaScript output."

I'm not sure that makes lazy evaluation backends "non-conforming". I did not find this language in PureScript's documentation. Nowhere man (talk) 21:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]