Talk:Robert Delpire

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Photography: History This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

This is excellent work (far better than fr:Robert Delpire). Well done, Lopifalko! However . . .

• It doesn't seem to offer a source for the claim that he was born in 1926 (while the French article doesn't seem to offer one for the claim that he was born two years later).
• "Delpire & Co." or "Delpire & Cie."? (Yes, imaginably the one in some contexts and the other in others.)
• Sometimes it's not clear whether an English title is an actual English title or a nonce translation into English of a French title.
• Sometimes it's not clear whether the French- and English-language editions are both being discussed (eg was awarded this or that prize), or only the former. (Offhand, I don't know if Delpire ever published in English. But I think that a number of the English-language editions, being largely the same, were printed together with the French ones. If I'm right, then effectively the design of the English-language edition, even if published by Thames & Hudson or wherever, would have been Delpire's.)

-- Hoary (talk) 00:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Hoary. And thank you for your expert copy editing, it's most welcome. I thought I was learning to be able to turn these things in without requiring as many of your tweaks as I once did. I'm surprised that the French article is so sparse; but then there wasn't even an English article at all until now, so...

I've dealt with his his year of birth, sourcing it to Delpire's biography at delpire.com, and altered the French article (interestingly, his French biography doesn't mention his year of birth, yet his English biography does). Lopifalko (talk) 08:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're doing well. Yes, I do more tweaking to your prose than you do to mine; but the reason for this is simple: I produce much less than you do. When I do produce something, you and others quickly come along to improve it. -- Hoary (talk) 10:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My alteration of his year of birth on the French Wikipedia was reverted, with a claim that delpire.com was in error, but without another ref to back up that claim. My understanding is that Wikipedia should defer to the author's own claim unless there is more compelling evidence coming from elsewhere, but I haven't the French language skills to debate that over there. -Lopifalko (talk) 08:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Citroën Furgoneta – "Is "furgoneta" not just the Spanish word for van?" – I thought so, but I also thought it the actual model name. I think you are probably right.
• I used English translations in the lead section so as to keep the lead section more succinct, less clogged up with nomenclature. Perhaps I shouldn't take such a liberty.

-Lopifalko (talk) 10:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I believe that Les Américains is different from The Americans, and not just in the language of the text that fills certain rectangles on the printed pages. And offhand I don't know about the relationship between the French- and the English-language first editions of Koudelka's book.

In general I'm happy to err toward precision, even if the result looks pernickety or pedantic: I don't want to confuse the reader, but I think that being aware that you're confused (with the conscious option of reading a little further in an effort to cut through the confusion) is better than being misled and wrongly confident that you understand. -- Hoary (talk) 12:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. And yes, of-course, it's obvious now we're talking about it, Les Américains (1958) is a distinctly different work to The Americans (1959). Or so I'm told, sadly not having a copy of Les Américains in my possession. -Lopifalko (talk) 10:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]