Talk:Robert Herjavec

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Croatia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario. This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

There seems to be some confusion about Mr. Herjavec's birth year, as some articles about him state it as being 1963, and some as 1962. Since his has published several books, his biographical data is in VIAF. According to that file, his CIP file from HarperCollins Canada states: "CIP info. (HarperCollins Canada):‏ ‡b (Canadian; 1962-09-14)". I have added a reference to that link with a quote, and have used 1962 as the birth date, based on the reliability of the source. Funandtrvl (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is he still married 74.75.139.9 (talk) 23:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever edited out the information about his affair with his co-star is kinda lame -- jd — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.179.170.170 (talk) 04:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The box that includes Herjavec's birthdate, education, etc. has his net worth as $200M. On other pages (Mark Zuckerberg, Oprah Winfrey, etc.), the net worth also contains the year of the information is based off of. This article *http://www.hollywoodtake.com/robert-herjavecs-net-worth-high-you-bet-kym-johnson-and-her-fiance-will-spare-no-expense-168586 states that "Robert Herjavec still has an estimated $200 million net worth." and is from June 17, 2016. I suggest adding (2016) to the net worth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.229.22.149 (talk) 18:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was not a contrary point of view for suggestion. Edit will denote (June 2016) next to $200M net worth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.229.22.149 (talk) 17:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have a few concerns about the "mansion" information in personal life section of the article. First, I'm on the fence about heavy.com's reliability. Second, it's unclear to me if Robert had anything to do with the "luminaries" who stayed at the mansion. No time frame is given and by my reading they may have been guests before the mansion had any connection to Herjavec, in which case it does not appear relevant to this article. I'm leaving it for now because it's not libelous nor anything that I think requires speedy deletion. I don't think this information adds anything to the article and may give an incorrect impression. Knope7 (talk) 20:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Please provide specific examples you find issue with.

I have just modified one external link on Robert Herjavec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131901064800/http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=5231 to http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=5231

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]