Talk:Rome Italy Temple
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rome Italy Temple article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Italy may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Controversy
The Controversy section doesn't seem to mention any "controversy". Is it just me, or is the proximity of another country/church a non-issue? And what does mutual non-recognition of baptisms have to do with this building? If there is a controversy, it needs to be spelled out more clearly, if there's no controversy the section should be removed. The only reference in the section is a dead link to a news story from 2001, long before this temple was announced. – jaksmata 14:57, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- I removed the dead link, and tagged the section for having no references. I found what I think is the same article that was being a source here, but it does not mention the temple, the controversy, or strained relations. The only thing it mentions is the cooperation with Catholic charities, but since the article is from 2001, you can't say that they "continue to work [together]".
- If anything, the source article confirms that there is no controversy, rather than there being one. – jaksmata 14:55, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
I agree with the above. As far as what can be found on official websites of both Mormons or Catholics or from the media, there is no evident controversy. I would eliminate this section as well. Fdlillo (talk) 14:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090521100222/http://www.acerson.com:80/temple to http://www.acerson.com/temple
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—