Talk:SEC Championship Game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

References

Can we have some proof this exists? --TrollHistorian 18:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Designated Home Team Record

The designated home team record, by my own personal count is 8-8 as of 2007. The designated away team won in 1992, 1993, 1995, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005 and the designated home team won in 1994, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2002, 2003, 2006, 2007. Rtr10 (talk) 04:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it goes every other year as who is home (between East/West), then the home team won 2007, 2006, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1996, 1994 according to the chart at SEC Championship Game#Results. (a total of 10 wins out of 16 games played so far, since the 2008 contest hasn't been played yet) Now, it may be the case that there were some years that it didn't follow the back and forth dynamic, but it is my understanding that East teams are home on even years, and West teams are home on odd years, which would give an overall 10-6 record for home teams. Cardsplayer4life (talk) 04:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the real record... For some reason there have been a couple of years that didn't alternate east/west as home away (ie LSU was home one year and then Auburn was home the very next year) Anyway, here is the record to finally settle this... HOME: 1994, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2006, 2007 (9) AWAY: 1992, 1993, 1995, 1997, 2000, 2004, 2005 (7) Rtr10 (talk) 10:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Would you happen to have a reference that you could link to showing what years are home/away? I looked all over SECSports.com, but I am not seeing where it says which team is home or away. It appears the only year that falls outside of the pattern would be the year 2000. (all the other Home wins are the same as I stated) I looked up an image from the game, and it does indeed appear that Florida has on a home jersey, although that may or may not mean they were officially classified as a home team. It isn't a huge deal either way since it is only one fact, but it would be nice to make sure we have it correct, so if you have a link you are using which states it, then that would be superb. I'll just add a citation needed tag for the moment until one can be found. Very nice job on the creation of all the other SEC Championship game articles, by the way! Cardsplayer4life (talk) 00:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to split

There is absolutely no reason why

split. Reywas92Talk 17:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Rey, this is the SEC Championship Game article NOT the Gator Bowl--Levineps (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I was wondering why you would put that here. This article is not really related to what you are talking about. Cardsplayer4life (talk) 17:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 June 2011

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per request. Disambiguation is now handled via hatnote. - GTBacchus(talk) 22:23, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]



SEC Football Championship Game → SEC Championship Game – The proper name of this game is simply the SEC Championship Game. Jweiss11 (talk) 21:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removal of post-season championship participants content

]

Team colors in game results table

I'm finding the Results table difficult to read, with all the different colors. Bolding is used, but it's lost in the kaleidoscope of coloring. I looked back through the page history; the team colors in the table were added on 28 September 2017‎ by an anonymous user, 108.171.131.189. I believe readability would be improved by removing the colors from the Results table, so I propose making that change (remove team colors from the Results table). Certainly all the teams have their own colors... but the noted use of those colors feels spurious and makes readability suffer, at least for me. Input from other editors welcome. Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 00:20, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to adjust the table so only the winning team appears with their team colors, which will make it immediately clear who the winning team was each year. Feedback welcome post-update. Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why is there the team colors in the first place. It just looks tacky, really no need for it. I liked it where there was no team color and the winning team was just in bold.--Jpp858 (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm OK either with keeping colors for winning teams, or removing colors and just bolding winners. Input from other editors welcome. Dmoore5556 (talk) 01:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@PCN02WPS: your input would be welcome on this. Dmoore5556 (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dmoore5556: I am strongly in favor of keeping colors for winning teams (as is the case with all other FBS conferences and the SWAC), it looks way better than colors for all teams, but lets those winning teams stand out a bit more than just bolding. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@PCN02WPS: Thanks. If you know other active editors who may want to give input on this, feel free to ping them. Dmoore5556 (talk) 02:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


– There are 21 sports in the SEC, most of which have a championship game (the exceptions being sports with championship "meets" and "matches"). Omitting "football" only breeds confusion. The majority of the conference football championship games in the Category:College football conference championship games include the word "football" in their title. There is no reason for "football" to be omitted here. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject College football has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ACC Championship Game which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]