User talk:Old Naval Rooftops
April 2013
Hello, I'm
October 2013
Hello, I'm Dr Greg. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Toast because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dr Greg talk 23:00, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
April Fools 2014
Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for extermination/Twelfth Doctor
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eyesnore (pc) 01:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Blocked
Hate to be a killjoy, but
Xterminate
Why would you want to have the article on the good doctor xterminated?. typical arrogant Unix user. Sometimes i think you guys would rather be robots than humans.(mercurywoodrose stretching the 4/1 humor farther than necessary)99.14.217.178 (talk) 05:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for extermination/Twelfth Doctor
2015 move discussions
Star Trek into Darkness
If "into" is the first word of the subtitle, shouldn't there be a colon (:)? If not, well, the whole title is the proper noun. "Star" is an adjective; "Trek" is a noun and may be a complement. "into" is a preposition; Darkness is a noun and a complement. "into Darkness" is a subtitle, but that shouldn't be a reason to move into "Into". This whole issue is confusing and makes MOS:CT and WP:NCCAPS ineffective. --George Ho (talk) 03:47, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
New question raised regarding Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request
Some opposers of this move
Move discussion Talk:MacBook (2015 version)
You participated in the move discussion there. PaleAqua suggested to move the article to
Talk:Gangsta.
You are invited to an ongoing RM; comment there for consensus. --George Ho (talk) 08:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Greyshirt
Hello! Just to let you know: During July you commented at a move request, now at
Talk:Bend It Like Beckham
There's an ongoing move discussion. --George Ho (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Oops!... I Did It Again
I invite you to this ongoing RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 00:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
Hello, Old Naval Rooftops. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic South of the Border (attraction). Thank you. --Labattblueboy (talk) 16:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Policy discussion in progress
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "Smells Like Teen Spirit", a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 11:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
April Fools 2016
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deletion (3rd nomination)
Itanimulli listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Itanimulli. Since you had some involvement with the Itanimulli redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 01:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
NPP
Re:
2016-17 move discussions
Talk:Gladstone
Hello Old Naval Rooftops. If you don't mind, please consider commenting on the move discussion linked above. Thanks.--
Murdeshwar
Hello, I have shared a link on the talk page of this page as a reply to your query. Please consider the spelling suggested as the wrong spelling mentioned by the person who first wrote an online article should not be allowed to carry forward.
Your unedit on We Are Number One
@Old Naval Rooftops Why did you undo my edit? It doesn't matter if the people on Reddit think if We Are Number One is the best "dank" meme. It should never be mentioned in a Wikipedia article unless if it is about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.248.16 (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Please sign your comments. (talk) 06:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)]
Discussion invite
Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 04:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
please check for residual BLP concerns -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
moe. (band) page move
You didn't read the
Could you please revise your opposition in light of this evidence? 208.44.170.115 (talk) 16:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Update: I referred to the wrong thing. It was this that I meant to post, referencing deadmau5. As you can clearly see, Wikipedia has rule pertaining to artists that allow the use of lowercase and special characters when referring to musicians or other people. Please take a look at it before you finalize your opinion. Thanks! 208.44.170.115 (talk) 20:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Be sure to read
Name change refused
Back in May 2018 I requested a simple name change, which you refused, adding your comments. I recently found it had been renamed exactly as requested by a registered editor with no drama.--86.29.222.228 (talk) 15:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- My opposition of the initial RM was mostly on procedural grounds. I don't feel a move review is necessary. (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)]
April Fools 2020
Please carefully read this information:
A community discussion has authorised the use of
Broadly,
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- You're an experienced editor, Old Naval Rooftops. That doesn't give you a license to vandalize pages on April 1st. If you continue, you will be facing a block. Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Scott The Woz/Madden NFL 08 incidents
Edit War
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Madden NFL 08; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2603:300F:D38:4000:2C88:1B6A:82BC:955F (talk) 17:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Don't keep reverting things
Scott the Woz is important to Madden 08's history, it's not like "Breath of the Wild" or "Mario 64", this is a small title that makes a new entry yearly, Scott The Woz is probably the most notable thing to happen to this game, There's a new entry yearly, there is no point removing it so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bidoof The OKay Historian (talk • contribs) 14:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Izuru Kamukura
Just realised my close at
]This Game blows
I need help to make Scott "Will Eventually Take a Look at the First Mega Man" Wozniak, please? Starkiryu64 (talk) 05:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Last undefeated team
None of the 16 NFL teams currently undefeated are the last undefeated team in 2021, because any of them can lose before another. O.N.R. (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC) Listen young man - There are currently 16 teams that are undefeated in the 2021 season, and the list is current. It has been done this way since 2016, and the list is true. Get over your self Spparky (talk) 12:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please look at https://www.pro-football-reference.com/friv/last-undefeated.htm. Since PFR lists all the 2021 undefeated teams, you should leave the page as is. I have the reference for you to look at. Please no more messing w this page. Thanks Spparky (talk) 18:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Old Naval Rooftops,
thank you for your correction of my clarification in the article Double-elimination tournament, section 'Pros and cons'.
Now it sounds more precise and understandable!
But I still want to ask you, why did you take out my last sentence:
That is why the double-elimination format is not used in tournaments of many sports (for example football and tennis).
Maybe you point out that is not the only reason for not using it? Would you agree with the following wording for the last sentence:
This is a most important reason why the double-elimination format is not used in tournaments of many sports that have high fitness requirements (for example, soccer, ice hockey and tennis).
Many greetings --Mathecrat (talk) 11:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Standard ArbCom sanctions notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
For additional information, please see the
Newimpartial (talk) 14:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
My page move, wast to reflect MLB's update playoff format.
Howdy. I moved those pages, to reflect that MLB has changed from the Wild Card Game format, to the Wild Card Series format. If you oppose this? would you accept the creation of a 'new' page, called "Major League Baseball Wild Series"? GoodDay (talk) 17:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Proposal to move Joker (Persona) to Ren Amamiya to reflect recent developments in regards to the name's canonicity
As of recently, the PC version of Persona 5 Royal has been revealed to automatically assign the default name of Ren Amamiya should the player switch the game's language upon resuming their save file. Especially given the name being associated with the character in other non-manga projects related to Persona 5 as well as on his Amiibo figure description, I think it's a good idea to acknowledge Ren Amamiya as his canon name and move the page to reflect that in the same vein as Yu Narukami from Persona 4
https://www.reddit.com/r/Persona5/comments/y9m07y/jokers_official_name_has_been_confirmed_in_game/ RebelYasha (talk) 21:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Hi ONR, You closed a requested move at Talk:Czech Republic men's national ice hockey team, citing the moratorium at Czech Republic. Mike Cline (closer at Czech Republic) clarified that the moratorium was not intended to impact other articles. This discussion may have been closed prematurely. Please reconsider this closure and arguments specifically related to this RM discussion and building of consensus. Thanks! Wracking talk! 18:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Mac Tonight
I didn't know someone actually added a Moon Man song on the Mac Tonight article in 2018, thanks for taking it out. I agree with you that it's not necessary, and that it's garbage. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 16:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Move review for Czech Republic men's national ice hockey team
An editor has asked for a Move review of Czech Republic men's national ice hockey team. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Wracking talk! 19:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with Wracking, this discussion was prematurely closed on a false basis. Conyo14 (talk) 17:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Requested move discussion
There is currently a Request Move discussion about William IV. Since you participated in the previous move discussion involving William IV, I thought you might want to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
2024 Men’s OFC Nations Cup Vote
Hello, you commented an oppose vote with how the common name is not the Men’s Nations Cup. I was wondering if you could look at some of the sources I provided & just let me know if you think that it isn’t enough. I haven’t really done many requested moves so probably provided less information than needed in my original update. Thanks! Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 13:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
secondhand notification
Per a request by SnowFire (talk · contribs), because of your participation in Talk:Michael Larson#Requested move 22 March 2024, you are being brought up to date on developments. After the article "Press Your Luck scandal" was written, "Michael Larson" was turned into a redirect. That redirect has since been undone (though mischaracterized as a "stealth copy & paste move"), and there are now two active discussions in which you may wish to participate, but might otherwise be unaware of:
- WP:BIO1E, the article title, and more.
- Talk:Michael Larson (disambiguation)#Requested move 1 May 2024 is discussing which page should be the primary topic and more.
I'm certainly involved in these discussions and will be happy to converse with you there if you're inclined. My apologies if this is undue, but it was implied that I have been negligent in my canvassing. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 00:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)