Talk:SIS Building

SIS Building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 19, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. More information: /  This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Architecture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: British / European This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The SIS building doesn't feature in the books, to the best of my knowledge. The headquarters building for Special Operations in the series is in a "bank" on Liverpool Street. As such I've removed the entry untill someone can provide evidence of it's appearance in one of the books. 86.9.213.112 (talk) 19:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who the hell cares XD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.219.146.110 (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://edition.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/09/21/britain.mi6.building/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

This review is

transcluded from Talk:SIS Building/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing this article. MWright96 (talk) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (

   lists

   ):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (

   focused

   ):

4. It follows the
   neutral point of view
   policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have

   suitable captions

   ):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• no dab links

Background

• Change modernizing to modernising
• The acronyms of the National Audit Office need to be included in brackets

Design and construction

• Remove the duplicate link to the National Audit Office
• £152.6m and £135.05m should both be changed to £152.6 million and £135.05 million
• 12,000 m2 needs a convert template with the square feet measurement included

Recent history

• Writing in The Telegraph after the attack, - Should be The Daily Telegraph for consistency

References

• no dead links
• References 10 and 15 are bare urls

That is what I found. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 13:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Thank you, I've made all of your suggested changes. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 16:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Happy to promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SIS Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150704074447/https://www.sis.gov.uk/our-history/buildings.html to https://www.sis.gov.uk/our-history/buildings.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]