Talk:San Miguel del Ene attack

A news item involving San Miguel del Ene attack was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 26 May 2021.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers / Organized crime Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance). Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Socialism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles Military history: South America / Post-Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  South American military history task force Post-Cold War task force Peru Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Peru To-do: edit history watch purge Assess and prioritise articles (log) Db-copyvio }} where appropriate Create : Expand: new articles; top importance articles FAC / FLC: Peru national football team GAN: Chachapoyas culture Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes Translate: National University of San Marcos Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive Wikify: articles needing attention

Previously the coordinates pointed to San Miguel, but the attack happened in San Miguel del Ene, which is about 91 km to the north. Abductive (reasoning) 06:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the article cites 16, but in the 'Investigation' section states 'ten men, six women and two minors', 10+6+2=18 Potholehotline (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article cites multiple sources that support 18 not 16 people were killed (see https://www.tvperu.gob.pe/noticias/nacionales/vraem-pnp-confirma-que-18-personas-fueron-asesinadas-en-el-centro-poblado-san-miguel-del-ene). I updated the lead to reflect the accurate number. Jurisdicta (talk) 00:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My edit was reversed removing the line that says the MPCP has said they are responsible for the attack. My reason for this dispute is that this article already states that the group's name was on the leaflets. This is not in dispute. However, later stating that the MPCP said it was responsible implies that there has been some sort of statement issued by the group in addition to the leaflets left at the scene. As far as I have been able to find out, there has been no such statement. RelevantAnecdote (talk) 03:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this to the talk page. The BBC source says "The far-left Shining Path guerrilla group says it was behind the attack.". BBC News is very

secondary source, which we prefer to primary sources. In other words, we trust what reports summarize over direct quotes. So the fact that the BBC says that the MPCP is behind the attacks, is a very high quality source to say that in the article. Please revert your change until a consensus has been reached here on the talk page. Laplorfill (talk) 03:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for the reply. I'm not trying to say that the BBC is not reliable. I think the sentence is poorly worded, leading to it being misinterpreted. I'd point out the quote's lack of detail coupled with it being located directly before the article talks about the name being on the leaflets. This doesn't lead me to believe that it refers to anything other than the leaflets themselves. Also, no other news outlets have reported on any additional statements made by the MPCP. I don't think this line should be included until some corroborating source can be found or the BBC provides some clarity. RelevantAnecdote (talk) 04:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"This doesn't lead me to believe that it refers to anything other..." is the problem. We go by what the source says, not your interpretation of it, or mine (see

WP:OR. The BBC article is clear. If there is a superseding source, that can be discussed, but until then, removing a well-sourced part of the article isn't a good idea. Laplorfill (talk) 04:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]