Talk:Scott Feldman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleScott Feldman has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 7, 2009Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconUnited States: Texas Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconCalifornia: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconChicago
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Scott Feldman/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
This article was nominated for
six good article criteria
.

I'll be reviewing the article against the

good article criteria. Any additional comments are welcome.--Giants27 (c|s) 03:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality: "Feldman" seems to be a reoccuring word to start paragraphs. Try "he" or "The Astros selected Feldman..."
Manual of Style compliance:
  • I made some changes, and now (by my quick count) only 8 of 51 paragraphs (never two in a row) begin with Feldman. Let me know if that is not sufficient. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2. Factually accurate and

verifiable
?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
Refs #14, 16, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 37, 38, 40-47, 49-56, 62-70, 72, 73, 75-77, 81 and 83 are missing publisher info. Ref #74 is completely lacking. Try using
WP:REFTOOLS
to fix this.
  • I'm missing something. Ref 21, for example, lists the publication as being "The San Mateo Daily Journal". My understanding has been that that is sufficient. Please tell me (if it is not) where the criteria that suggests that that is not sufficient is located. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ahh...you're right I must've missed it since it's included in the link which is no problem. However refs #65 and #74 are just links and need the relevant info.--Giants27 (c|s) 12:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whew. Thanks. I've now addressed those two -- good catch.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No original research
:
Is, "He was sent down, however, on May 1. That began a trend, as he was called up and send down five more times during the season," sourced?
Is, "The eight innings were Feldman’s major-league high, as he mixed in a changeup, curveball, and slider with his fastball," sourced?
Is, "He joined, among others, Kinsler, Brad Ausmus, Kevin Youkilis, Ryan Braun, Gabe Kapler, Jason Marquis, John Grabow, Craig Breslow, Scott Schoeneweis, and Jason Hirsh," sourced?

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a

neutral point of view
?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by

images
, when possible and appropriate?: Pass

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales
:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
WP:ALT
, there must be alt text for the images. And the image in the infobox needs a caption.
  • Done (hopefully correctly -- I'm a newbie at this issue.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:ALT discourages using names. As another editor once told me "describe it as if you're describing it to your blind friend who knows nothing about the subject or the sport".--Giants27 (c|s) 12:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK -- I've taken a second stab. Hopefully this is better.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

This article is very close to GA quality and I see no reason why it won't be with the minor tweaks mentioned above.--Giants27 (c|s) 03:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am now passing this article for GA, since all of my minor concerns were met. Great job, feel free to review a
WP:GAN specifically in the sports and recreation section which is heavily backlogged. Cheers,--Giants27 (c|s) 19:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a
reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate
it.

Minor correction to 2006 Brawl section

Just wanted to point out that Buck Showalter was the Rangers manager in 2006. Ron Washington would not join the team until the offseason of 2006. Yvehc76 (talk) 22:26, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and elsewhere online. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see

guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2017

please put #37 67.86.57.10 (talk) 21:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 21:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]