Talk:Servite Order

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Saints Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism High‑importance Servite Order is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles Women in Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Would it be appropriate to mention Servite high school of Anaheim on this page, which is run by the Servites? --Peter Kirby 08:52, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs to be reconciled with Medicant_order. That page does not list this as an 'original order.' Although, there seems to be some confusion with regard to great vs. original. --Keddie 00:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parts of this article seems to be plagiarized from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13736a.htm can someone look into fixing this? Oboler (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Cath ency is public domain. History2007 (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090124183546/http://www.servidimaria.org:80/en/attualita/promotori2/promotori2.htm to http://www.servidimaria.org/en/attualita/promotori2/promotori2.htm#THE_MARIANUM_PONTIFICAL_THEOLOGICAL_FACULTY

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified one external link on Servite Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150418144652/http://www.thegrotto.org/index.php/about-us/servites/ to http://www.thegrotto.org/index.php/about-us/servites/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no diocese of Belville, NC, nor is there a diocese of Blue Island, IL, nor has there ever been such a diocese. Since this section of the article doesn't have sources, I don't know where to go to find out what is meant.

JediKnyghte (talk) 05:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the time, I add very little content anymore, as I just can't be bothered. Now and then, if I see a tag, I'll hunt up a citation, just to clean things up a bit. Periodically, I come across an article that years ago was lifted from Catholic Encyclopedia; no problem, its public domain. Most of the time it carries an attribution tag. The syntax is both polished and archaic and tends to give the Catholic viewpoint, unless someone has toned it down. THE WHOLE ARTICLE SCREAMS "CE"! Nonetheless, some genius will come through and plaster the most uncontroversial statement with a "citation-needed" tag. I can list about six editors who seem to do nothing else.
Case in point: the initial History section herein had six paragraphs. The first was a brief, not too important intro w no citations. Having gotten that far someone decided to tag the entire section apparently oblivious to the fact that there were eight citations following. I debated whether to dispose of the apparently offending intro, but merged it with the opening paragraph, split the now long paragraph, repaired a broken link, and moved on. ..."A reference at the end of a paragraph typically refers to the whole paragraph, and similarly a reference at the end of a sentence may almost always be taken as referring to the whole sentence. If a particular part of a sentence or paragraph seems to require a separate citation, or looks as if it may have been inserted into the text at a sentence or paragraph level, try to check the original reference rather than adding tags to text that may already be well referenced. Do not insert a "Citation needed" tag to make a point, to "pay back" another editor, or because you "don't like" a subject, a particular article, or another editor." ...That section has still has 6 ¶s and 8 citations and there is nothing particularly controversial about any of it. What's seems to be the problem? Manannan67 (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The Order goes back to a group of seven men," - is not English Language and this is an English Language article. The current text is not much better... the article is quite promotional and pedantic.

I encourage you to make your changes 1 at a time.

Please do not remove the article tag. No, I did not add it. Yes it needs to be there.

Please wp:assume good faith.

After review, I will continue to restore the damaged text and the damaged article tag as needed.

Shajure (talk) 15:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since the editor warred the changes out in a single block, again... I restored 1 at a time. Please edit in detail, rather than

wp:edit war.Shajure (talk) 15:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

There was nothing stealthy about it. The section has sufficient citations. "Do not insert a "Citation needed" tag to make a point, to "pay back" another editor, or because you "don't like" a subject, a particular article, or another editor." ..." And don't accuse others of edit wars, simply because things are beyond your grasp. Manannan67 (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, then some editor other than the 2 of us will remove the tag.

Again please read, understand and follow

Wp:talk page to your reading/following.Shajure (talk) 18:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Tightened up the lead, turned it into a single paragraph, made S1 into an English sentence, it was a phrase. Not sure we need the last bit about the friars being a community but I left it.Shajure (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed elliptical wording/pedantry/overly-exuberant-wording from 1st couple of paragraphs and tightened it up a great deal. The entire article needs tightening.Shajure (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]