Talk:Short Creek raid

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 26, 2013, July 26, 2019, and July 26, 2023.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Latter Day Saint movement Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Arizona Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

The two links to LIFE magazine articles regarding photographs of the 1953 Short Creek Raid are no longer functioning properly, one leads solely to an index of LIFE photo essays and the other leads to a Google image search, which while it contains a couple images from the raid, lacks any additional information or explanation. Upon searching I did find the appropriate LIFE article, containing the relevant photos, with which I will replace the now defunct links if no one objects. However there only appears to be one article so I propose that the second citation of a LIFE article be deleted. MissKatie89 (talk) 03:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)MissKatie89[reply]

:Changes to what is available online does not change what was printed 60+ years ago. The url to the sources that is no longer online could reasonably be eliminated, but not the whole citation. Also have you tried the Internet Archive or other possible alternate online sources for digital archives for the material no longer online from the original source? -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 23:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you'll reread that's exactly what I said. That the links no longer lead to the LIFE article, but that it is still online and I found it via googling, therefore I propose changing the citation to reflect the current URL. The same article appears to be cited twice though, I thought there may be two articles but it does not appear that is the case from LIFE's archives. Therefore I'm not sure both citations are necessary. And none of it was printed 60+ years ago, the citation is clear that the LIFE article was published in 2011. MissKatie89 (talk) 01:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)MissKatie89[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Short Creek raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817130203/http://www.childpro.org/2001-2002%20media/2001-02%20media%2001.htm to http://www.childpro.org/2001-2002%20media/2001-02%20media%2001.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080620031315/http://www.slate.com:80/toolbar.aspx?action=print to http://www.slate.com/toolbar.aspx?action=print&id=2189274
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/04/07/texas.ranch/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080426011725/http://extras.sltrib.com:80/specials/polygamy/raidaccount.asp to http://extras.sltrib.com/specials/polygamy/raidaccount.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]