Talk:Social Democratic Party "Harmony"

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Latvia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Socialism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: Political parties Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Is there any reason the name the party uses in translation (concord) is not used for the article?--Goldsztajn (talk) 12:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can't imagine. "Concord" is a better translation anyway. Rename the article?

Лудольф (talk) 13:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

English language scholarly sources have used the named "Harmony", e.g. example 1, example 2,example 3, example 4, even if it appears not to have been the translation used by the party itself.--Autospark (talk) 21:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I support the current translation, even though I find inverted commas a little bit awkward. --Checco (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"It is the main catch-all party of the centre-left in Latvian politics."

That statement in the article has no source.

In fact, later on, it is clarified that:

"On social policy, the party contains strong conservative elements in line with its voter base and setting it apart from the contemporary European social-democratic mainstream.[10][11]"

So it's not exactly centre-left, if it has strong conservative elements.

It's main defining feature, based on sources, should be the following:

""Harmony" is the largest party seeking to represent the Russian-speaking population of Latvia."

Looks like this article needs some work.

Sounds like to me this party is a right-wing party for the Russian-speaking population of Latvia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudolfensis (talk • contribs) 20:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]