Talk:Socialism in liberal democratic constitutions

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Socialism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

@Fyunck(click): See article. Important here. Of the 10 states with constitutional references in their constitution, only one calls itself a socialist state (Tanzania).. Also note that socialism were either introduced by Marxist–Leninist which had strong presence in legislatures or socialist movements that tried and failed to introduce a socialist state system. The exception here is India and Sri Lanka. India uses socialism to denote secularism and Sri Lanka socialism was introduced by a right-wing party considered liberal conservative, and which removed references to socialist economics to privatise the economy. In Bangladesh socialism was reintroduced (as much as feasibly possible) so as the constitution looked more like the original (and like the constitution of the military dictators). --TIAYN (talk) 08:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No need to ping me. You have run roughshod over Wikipedia protocol at Socialist state. I have no idea how you avoided a block for 5 reverts in rapid succession. You removed a red link template on an article that still has something like 18 useless red links. The article looks to be written as POV, and that template was also removed by you. I don't deal well with WP:OWN. When you start acting as a team player I'll take notice. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:56, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fyunck(click): The fact that you say POV when its referenced by 106 secondary references is beyond me. --TIAYN (talk) 20:36, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a

reliable source if appropriate. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 16:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

The founding document cites the failure of the communist system. It calls for the changing times to reflect a new way forward. [1]

Poland

The founding document distinctly condemns all forms of totalitarian systems, including communism. It couples communism with fascism.

^[2]

Hungary

The founding document blatantly and directly criticizes its past ruling communist regime and denounces all past activities of the past marxist-leninist government as criminal and illegal. ^[3] 95.239.192.57 (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]