Talk:Sons of Zadok

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bible Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Judaism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Christianity Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Jewish history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ancient Near East Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Genealogy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please In ictu oculi (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:25, 13 September 2011 (edit) (undo)

I apologize once again for having to undo your work, I know you must have put in a large amount of time editing this article (and quite a few edits i find helpful), but please consider the vast amount of hours I spent researching the article detail and creating it. Below is a partial list of reasons for my revert;

• Changing "Divrei Torah" ref. to "Torah study"! (the former is a book, the latter a mitzvah)
• Changing the Mincha offering from plant life form to vegetable? (veg's -per common english usage- are not sacrificed on the mizbeach)
• Kohanim the levites, sons of.. The word "the" does not exist in orig. text (if need be -for clarification- it may be inserted in brackets)
• Largscale change of Kohanim to priests (this seems to be pending resolution at the Kohen:Talk page)

The above are just a few mistakes that can be easily avoided where proper research taken on your part. But, as said above helpful edits have been made and I encourage you to try again. If you do not feel up to it or do not have the time I will go through the page and return those constructive additions of your contribution.--Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marecheth HoeElohuth

The 3 items you have given, even if correct, could have been changed in 1 minute, they do not serve as an excuse for reverting all the spellings to non-standard spellings such as "book of Yechezkel" (sic).

1. How will anyone know what you mean by "Divrei Torah" if you fail to add proper footnotes?
2. "Changing the Mincha offering from plant life form to vegetable?" - that was just better English, we don't say "plant life form" unless we are from Mars.
3. "Kohanim the levites, sons of.." --- in regard to Ancient Israel WP:RS use "priests"

In ictu oculi (talk) 01:12, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that the error's you've made on this article are "minor", this case shows a lack of proper research on your part and neglect of tremendous efforts of other editors.--Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (talk) 20:42, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks, please, instead comment on the content, not on the contributor. That's policy. See below for comments on the deplorable current state of the article. Andrewa (talk) 06:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't a mincha offering a grain (ground wheat?) offering? Would it not therefore be better to say"grain offering" rather than "plant" or "vegetable" offering? PraeceptorIP (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marecheth Ho'eElohuth, aside from

• At the very least if publication years, editions, ISBNs, languages, are not going to added the sources should at least be wikilinked so that Wikireaders can click through to the primary sources:

not as 3. ^ Midrash ha-Gadol to Bereishit 6:4 et al.

instead 3. ^ Midrash HaGadol on Genesis 6:4, in Mordecai Margulies, editor and introduction, Midrash haggadol on the Pentateuch. Genesis. Edited From the Various Manuscripts Mosad Haraw Kook, Jerusalem 1947, reprinted 1975. ISBN.

FYI This is what happens when these refs are wikilinked:

1. ^ The term of popular

Yechezkel

4:5

2. ^ i.e. the services of/on the Mizbeach

3. ^

Midrash ha-Gadol to Bereishit

6:4 et al.

4. ^

Tosfot to tractate Taanith

p. 17b

5. ^

Yosef Karo) p. 55b, Rashi to Talmud tractate Zvachim

p. 101b

6. ^ See "Torath HaKohanim", M. Rizikoff, Minor Chap. 200

7. ^

Koheleth Rabbah

Chap. 1

8. ^

Yechezkel

43:19

9. ^ Medrash HaBiur (Sadya Al-Dmari) to Haphtorah Parshat Emor

10. ^

yechezkel

chap. 2

11. ^

Chafetz Chaim

to the Torah, Haphtorah to Parshat Emor

12. ^ Malbim to Malachi 3:3

13. ^ Rosh to Devarim 10:8

14. ^ "Elef HaMagen (Elishevitz) to Haphtorah Parshat Emor

15. ^ malbim to Melachim 2 23:9

16. ^

Abarbanel, Malbim

17. ^ the former listed in Parshat Emor (in VaYikra) and the latter in the Haftarah to Parshat Emor

18. ^ "Ohel Yehoshua" to Haftarath Emor

19. ^ "Divrei Tovah" to Shmuel 1 2:37

20. ^

Yechezkel

43:19

21. ^ as per common Kaballah teaching that north is synonymous with monetary issue

22. ^ Ahavath Yonathan to Haftarah Emor

23. ^ "

Chasam Sofer to Orach Chayim

chap. 15 (second count)

24. ^ Elef HaMagen to Haftarah Emor

25. ^ Korban Nethanel (of Damascus) to Haftarath Emor

26. ^ Talmud Bavli to Kiddushin 78b

27. ^ malbim, yonathan eibshitz, et. al

28. ^ see The Torah instruction of the Kohanim

29. ^ "Torath HaParsha" (Ahron Zakkai) to Haftarath Emor

30. ^ "

Yechezkel (as quoted in "Bechor Yaakov

")

31. ^ Yonathan Eibshitz

32. ^ "

Vayikra 21:14 (quoted in chumash Otzar Rishonim

)

33. ^ Malbim to Yechezkel 44:15-22

34. ^

Radak

35. ^ "

Vayikra 21:14 (printed in Chumash "Otzar HaRishonim

")

36. ^

Sifri to Devarim

33:10 (and 21:5)

37. ^ Tzavrei Shallal" of the Chid"a to Haftarath Emor

38. ^ Malbim to Yechezkel 44:24

39. ^ "

Chaim Palagi

) to Yechezkel chap. 44

40. ^ Mishmereth Tzvi to Haftarath Parshat Emor

41. ^ Ahavath Yonathan to Haftarath Parshat Emor

42. ^ Pri Tzadik to Parshat Emor

43. ^ Malbim to Yechezkel 40:41

44. ^ Then

Book of Yechezkel

is described as six Amahs, with each Amah consisting of six Tefachs

45. ^ with the greater tribe of Levi including Kohanim as well

46. ^ Yechezkel chapters 45 and 48

47. ^ Serech Hayachad p. 22 (B. T. Katz, Sod H'Mgilloth)

48. ^ "Sali and its elders", introduction to chap. 1

49. ^ Geiger, Urschrift pp. 20 &c

50. ^

Avoth deRabbi Nathan

5:2

51. ^ Sifri to Devardim p. 233 (Torah Ve'Hamitzvah edition)

52. ^ Rambam to

Avoth

chap. 2

53. ^ Hilchoth Avodah Zarah 10:2

54. ^ Additional aspects disproving that association include a Chazalic mention that the Sadduccee and Boethusian groups favored using vessels of Gold and Silver whereas the common vessel usage of Kohanim -to negate transmission of Tumah- where typically of stone

In ictu oculi (talk) 01:54, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This move goes against WP:RS and WP:EN. I'll submit to requested moves In ictu oculi (talk) 01:12, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move