Talk:StarTrack

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal StarTrack is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Written like an advertisement

This article is written like an advertisement. The about section provides no neutral information of substance and should be rewritten. "When service matters, choose StarTrack." is not at all appropriate for a Wikipedia article by any stretch of the imagination. --

talk) 14:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.star-track.com.au/about_startrack/timeline.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see

guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150625205551/http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/companies/australia-post-to-buy-qantas-out-of-freight-group-startrack-express-in-400-million-deal/story-fndgp8b1-1226486162571 to http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/companies/australia-post-to-buy-qantas-out-of-freight-group-startrack-express-in-400-million-deal/story-fndgp8b1-1226486162571

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 23:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on StarTrack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140510182229/http://auspost.com.au/about-us/rebrand-messenger-post-couriers.html to http://auspost.com.au/about-us/rebrand-messenger-post-couriers.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

StarTrack International

I think the article need to mention StarTrack International was sold to Aramex via a JV of Aramex and Auspost. Anyone able to dig out secondary source? https://apgecommerce.com/?page_id=52 Matthew hk (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]