Talk:Statewide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

Section sizes Section size for Statewide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries (50 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 1,641 1,641 Background 3,439 3,439 Polling in the four early primary states 6,111 6,111 Polling for Super Tuesday 4,109 4,109 Primary and caucus calendar 10,335 10,335 Iowa caucus 227 227 New Hampshire primary 264 264 Nevada caucus 236 236 South Carolina primary 268 268 Alabama primary 236 236 Arkansas primary 240 240 California primary 274 274 Colorado primary 240 240 Maine primary 228 228 Massachusetts primary 260 260 Minnesota primary 244 244 North Carolina primary 264 264 Oklahoma primary 240 240 Tennessee primary 244 244 Texas primary 228 228 Utah primary 224 224 Vermont primary 236 236 Virginia primary 240 240 Idaho primary 247 247 Michigan primary 259 259 Mississippi primary 271 271 Missouri primary 259 259 North Dakota caucus 275 275 Washington primary 267 267 Arizona primary 255 255 Florida primary 255 255 Illinois primary 259 259 Wisconsin primary 266 266 Ohio primary 1,268 1,268 Kansas primary 248 248 Oregon primary 249 249 Delaware primary 587 587 Indiana primary 697 697 Maryland primary 690 690 Montana primary 253 253 New Mexico primary 269 269 Pennsylvania primary 648 648 Georgia primary 1,092 1,092 New York primary 691 691 New Jersey primary 745 745 Connecticut primary 1,214 1,214 Notes 104 104 References 28 28 See also 480 480 External links 364 364 Total 42,268 42,268

It would be nice to have a section that has a graph for aggregated polls from all Super Tuesday states (similar to the one for the 4 early states) as this is an important part of the primary process.

Apologies if this is the wrong place to make a suggestion like this, I'm new to this. --Jawlecks (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a very good idea. We just need to see if there's aggregate polling for all the Super Tuesday states Maxmalho (talk) 14:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there's seven Morning Consult polls that include Super Tuesday states so far. I don't know how to make graphs yet (I'll try), but I went ahead and found all the polling sources on the Wayback machine. Here's Morning Consult polls from 2020 that contain polling specifically for Super Tuesday states as a group for January 7th, January 14th, January 22, January 28th, February 3rd, February 11th, and February 19th. Cheers, Leftist Commentary (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Using this beautiful information above, I have made a graph. Unfortunately, I can't figure out why the bottom starts at 2 instead of 0, but other than that it looks good.

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

I adjusted the y-Axis. --Spiffy sperry (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First draft of an introduction/section explanation: "The following graph depicts the evolution of the standing of each candidate in the March 3rd, 2020 Super Tuesday states (Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia) since January 7th, 2020. Data source is the Morning Consult." Leftist Commentary (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the graph.

talk) 22:52, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

can someone add the YouGov polls that came out today.Alhanuty (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneGambling8nt (talk) 18:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add the new Arkansas poll.Alhanuty (talk) 03:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of the major polling aggregators are picking this one up, and I can't find any indication of this "OurProgress" as a legitimate polling firm. If a major aggregator takes it seriously I will add it, but not at present.Gambling8nt (talk) 06:27, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the last presidential primary season, I was involved in updating a map that summarized the statewide polling. I have uploaded a similar map for this race, and wanted to discuss it here before adding it to the article. This map was prepared using the following guidelines: 1) striped shading shows ties if one candidate is within 2x the margin of error of the leader, since the margin of error is applied to both candidates, and 2) combined results from the latest polls may be used if they have overlapping date ranges. I think other aspects of the map are clear from the legend. --Spiffy sperry (talk) 20:45, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]