Talk:Steve Wariner

Steve Wariner has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 25, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). Country Music Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Country MusicTemplate:WikiProject Country MusicCountry Music articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Indiana Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Steve Wariner/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: User:ChrisTofu11961 (talk · contribs) 22:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I was happy to help review an article pertaining to country music. There are not enough of us actually writing the articles.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (

   lists

   ):

   As stated previously, make sure that you are including an overview that makes sense for the article you are writing. Steve Wariner has had a long career and a short overview would not make sense to readers. It is important we provide the best snapshot of the article as we can. Thank you for fixing that per my sugestion. Another thing to be mindful of is run-on sentences. Be careful with making sentences too long as I noticed a lot of long sentences throughout the article. The meaning of the sentence got lost in its length. It is also better to use active voice rather than passive voice (subject of the sentence first). Just something to be mindful of as you continue to write.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   You did a great job here! I learned a lot about Steve Wariner in reading this article.

Nothing I saw n read was right bout real steve 2601:588:C001:12F0:7CB9:69AA:A5AC:D221 (talk) 05:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fellow Editors,

This is my first talk page post, so I hope this is more or less how you do it, and I look forward to constructive feedback.

In the "Personal Life" section of the Steve Wariner article the existing text reads that Wariner fathered his first son "although the two were not married at the time."

I propose the deletion of these approx. 47 characters for the following reasons:

1. Relevance: The marital (or extramarital) status is emphasized in a way that doesn't contribute to our understanding of Wariner's public life or career. In fact, the section reads just as informatively without it by offering a clear chronology of his children's births and his marriage.
2. Neutral Point of View (NPOV): The redundant/emphatic inclusion of this statement, especially by using the word "although," can imply a value judgment in many cultures and contexts.
3. Privacy of Living Person: Overall, this phrase seems unnecessarily invasive. The "
   Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid
   : it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives; the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment."

Minerviades (talk) 10:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Part 2 of this question might concern deletion of this thread as well. Toward the top of this talk page there is a reminder: "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous."

I wouldn't think this issue is at the level of libel, and it seems to be sourced (?), but should we also remove this thread after resolving this question in the spirit of privacy? Anyone familiar with the norms and rules? Thanks!

-min | Minerviades (talk) 00:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]