Talk:Stress in early childhood

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Psychological stress#Stress and health|body]] The anchor (#Stress and health) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Stress (biology)#Depression|depressed]] Anchor Stress (biology)#Depression links to a specific web page: Depression (mood). The anchor (#Depression) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Cortisol#Factors generally increasing cortisol le|cortisol]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned references in Stress in early childhood

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Stress in early childhood's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "About":

From
better source needed
]
From
Adverse Childhood Experiences Study: "About the CDC-Kaiser ACE Study". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention. Archived from the original on 28 February 2015. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help
)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of 29 November edits

I had originally planned to tag just the

editorializing when I noticed that it was added in a batch of substantial revisions and deletions by user Mike Scheeringa on 29 November. Looking at the edit history shows the removal and revision of entire sections of the article on a single night, without discussion. Editorializing aside, he also appears to have cited himself

at one point (although it is valid research published in a reputable journal). I copied his name into Google to find that he is indeed a qualified expert in psychiatry, but that he has a number of potential conflicts-of-interest, among them the publication of rival research and the pending release of a book.

Though I certainly agree with some of his revisions (eg, the removal of the how-to section), given their extent I do believe that this article requires outside review for neutrality. I myself lack the qualifications to do so and furthermore I'm uncertain how exactly to treat this particular instance of original research. --Arikeri (talk) 05:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just went through all of Mike Scheeringa's November 2020 edits one by one. Here is a summary of his edits and what I've reverted.

I agree with his removal of basic biological information on stress; it didn't even have a focus on children in specific. He also removed some content which was totally inappropriate for Wikipedia, such content telling the reader how to spot early childhood abuse in a very direct fashion. Another removed item was a section that only had "a single reference from 1997 and no supporting research". I did not check whether it did or did not have supporting research myself, but it was indeed a singular primary source backing it all up; the quality and quantity of sources for this specific theory was simply not there. I did, however, decide to re-add the ACE pyramid image, I thought that one was quite useful.

The biggest problems were the obvious

synthesis

problems in his ACE additions. Regardless, in my opinion, the COI combined with the aforementioned issues is enough reason for me to revert all his additions where he cited himself. It should also be noted that during his edits some seemingly unrelated sources got tangled up and seemed to source completely irrelevant material. I presume this wasn't the case before his edits.

All in all, the article is back to a neutral state, in my opinion.--Megaman en m (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]