Talk:Terese Nielsen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconDungeons & Dragons C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject icon
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
D&D to-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)
WikiProject iconWomen artists
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Importance

I rewrote the article (tried adding a NOPV, mainly) but I'm not sure whether to remover the tag. Anyone? -- Bakabaka 08:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving here

These two small sections were in the article under "Career." They seem promotional, and they're unsourced, so I'm moving them here for discussion.

Angel Quest

In 2005 Terese was asked by Brian and Alex Tinsman, the founders of Angel Quest, to design, art direct and illustrate a set of 100 cards suggesting 100 random acts of kindness to perform. Some of the quests are as simple as smiling or giving someone a hug and some require more time such as picking up trash in your neighborhood or writing a letter to an individual that has made a difference in your life.

Angel Quest is the first project in which my talents, heart and soul completely converged in a profoundly fulfilling way.

Extreme alteration

One service provided by Terese to her Magic the Gathering fans is an "extreme alteration" where she will radically alter the card by painting over it. These works have been collected and 2 series of posters displaying the altered cards are currently selling on her website.

--Rosalthe (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bounding into Comics is not reliable

I have removed a reference citing Bounding into Comics. Bounding into Comics is an alt-right disinfo site and false rumour-mill, not a legitimate outlet on pop-culture news, and most definitely not a reliable source, as it mostly publishes (very slanted) opinions, rather than properly fact-checked information. Luckily, the citation was redundant, as better sources are already cited on the subject. 46.97.170.112 (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]