Talk:The 15:17 to Paris

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is supported by the American cinema task force. France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Netherlands This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't understand this deletion. Unlike the other opinions there, this one is of a fellow working for a non-notable thing. With the others, we can better understand the nature of the commentator's status by their in-lined organizational article. Here we are bereft of that. And "but you can click through and learn it" is not a sufficient answer. It is two words. Seriously. You can click through and see for whom the other critics work for, but we don't as a result delete their publication names, and only list their names. --2603:7000:2143:8500:1D36:6FB6:FDDA:9EB2 (talk) 01:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At the end of the day, I agree with Mathglot - it is a non-RS, just a self-published blog, and should therefore be removed. --2603:7000:2143:8500:94D2:447:CF44:F53 (talk) 00:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]