Talk:The Adventures of the Galaxy Rangers

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the |unref= parameter from this template.

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Toys To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles. Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles. Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys }} banner. Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Comics: United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Westerns: Television Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television task force.

United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

	Guild of Copy Editors
This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2020 and 15 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Piscesrising1317.

Above undated message substituted from

• The page has begun to exceed the page length suggested size
• Most of the latest entries by I.P. only submitters have been comprised of information that was not provided within the limits of the show, leading to speculation vs facts. I'm wondering if a better idea in order to bridge that information with the show within the wiki would be to create a subset page, perhaps Galaxy Rangers Technical or the like. Also, it would be prudent to investigate the wiki's policy on fact vs fiction in regards to this area (if there is one). I'm thinking there might be something out there. Thanks Rabbi Bob 20:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Found the following on the Simplified Ruleset page (#3): No original research. Articles may not contain any previously unpublished arguments, concepts, data, ideas, statements, or theories. Moreover, articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of: published arguments, concepts, data, ideas, or statements — that serves to advance a position.. In reading that, I remove the remark to create a subset page as that information would violate the rule. Hopefully the entries that were created can be reviewed and edited for content. Rabbi Bob 20:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I vote for merging
  Galaxy Rangers into this article, making the information from that article the core of this page due to being much better written. Then a redirect can be put on that page to this one due to this page having the correct title, yet people being more likely to search for Galaxy Rangers. Nezu Chiza 01:09, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I second that vote. R.G. 10:55,7 December 2005 (UTC)

• I agree the articles should be merged since it was I who started the articles in tbe first place. User:Dwanyewest 16:56,12 December 2005 (UTC)

• I also suggest to merge
  Galaxy Rangers
  into this article, since "The Adventures of the Galaxy Rangers" is the correct title of the show.

Since I founded this article I am proud of how many times its been updated so far? I think that the names should be merged its about time? User:Dwanyewest

I changed the reference to only one DVD being available, because in the links provided at the bottom of the page you can order four different DVDs with four episodes of the series each. Dogson.

I am unsure of the status of the post 2002 version of Betamountain.org, however I am the creator and holder of the content from the original site. I'm curious what the opinions are to merging that information into the Wiki? Rabbi Bob 10:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Galaxy Rangers episodes

Hi I have sought permission from betamountain.org editors permission to use his information for episodes guides on wikipedia does anyone i have email evidence to verify thisDwanyewest (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I did not see this until now, four years after the fact. I recall the conversation and giving approval. I have archived the site even though the domain was lost once it was transferred to another caretaker. --Rabbi Bob (talk) 00:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Return

Updated the characters page as the "official" GR site is no longer online and as it is, I managed to regain the betamountain.org domain the past year. I still have that email and that answers a question I had that I forgotten all about. Thanks for keeping the light lit. It is my strong opinion that the "Not to be confused with" line at the top is not useful and should be removed: the side panel box visuals clearly indicate the show\product and it is immediately evident that this is neither of the mentioned items. Rabbi Bob (talk) 16:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Although Wikipedia is a non-profit organization, these are limits to which certain information is allowed. Although

Should include information about a potential graphic novel as it according the website its being planned.[1]Dwanyewest (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 18:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Fair use rationale for Image:Galaxy-rangers slaverlord.jpg

fair use

.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 18:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hearst Entertainment?

It says that Koch owns the rights to the show. However, Hearst Entertainment has a page for it. Can anybody clarify who owns what? BCI had to license Filmation's Flash Gordon series from Hearst in order to release it. Is that the same case here, or does Hearst only own the TV distribution rights with Koch owning the IP (and thus all int'l media rights)? It's clear that when ITF Enterprises (the show's original distributor) went out of business, somebody picked up the show for distribution of some kind. Again, can anyone clarify what's going on here? Brittany Ka (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have this from 6/24/2004 in my email and unfortunately the original VSM article no longer exists that is referenced: http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/news/Galaxy-Rangers/1753 --00:28, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Rabbi Bob (talk) 00:28, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]