Talk:The Boat Race 2005

The Boat Race 2005 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 27, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from The Boat Race 2005 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 April 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the 2005 University Boat Race featured eight Olympic rowers? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Boat Race 2005.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rowing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing articles To-do list: edit history watch purge Featured Articles: Raise the rowing (sport) article to featured status. Get article relisted to 'good article status' Put through another round of peer review, see here Nominate for featured status Ditto for Henley Royal Regatta, The Boat Race , Steve Redgrave Stubs: see here.. Tag {{Rowing-stub}} onto all rowing stub articles so we can keep track of them. Expand stubs to at least start class. Image requests: see here.. Article requests: see here.. Write bios for World Rowing champions (see the redlinks in the templates) Document FISA database errors University of Cambridge This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge Wikiproject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

England Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:The Boat Race 2005/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SchroCat (talk · contribs) 14:39, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll pick this one up too: again, it may be a day or so before I get going. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 14:39, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, I've put this page on watchlist so I don't miss it! The Rambling Man (talk) 14:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Overall Again, nicely put together, and close to GA as it stands. I've made a couple of very small tweaks: nothing too much.

Lead

• A little on the brief side, but it's a short article, and it seems pointless to repeat the who article in the lead!
  • I'll see what I can do. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "The race, umpired by six-time Boat…" Worth linking "umpired"?
  • Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crews

• "Oxford coach Dan Topolski rated both crews as "good enough to make an Olympic final".": this looks like it's a direct quote from Topolski, but the source doesn't seem to suggest it is.
  • Rephrased. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Race description

• "Oxford out-rated Cambridge": it may be worth a footnote to explain what "out-rated" means, for those who may not know.
  • Linked to our glossary. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• No dab or dead links, refs are solid.

Again, minor pickings from me, and no deal-breakers again, just a little tweak here and there. - SchroCat (talk) 19:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SchroCat: Thanks again, you're a gent. Have responded and updated accordingly, hopefully by the time you're back I'll have made the lead a bit fatter. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent: all good and happy to pass here.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: Y

   B.

   lists

   : Y

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A.

   References to sources

   : Y

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Y

   C. No original research: Y

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects: Y

   B. Focused: Y

4. Is it
   neutral
   ?

   Fair representation without bias: Y

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc: Y

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are

   copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

   : Y

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with

   suitable captions

   : Y

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: All good: I am happy to ✓ Pass – SchroCat (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]