Talk:The Flying House (TV series)

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anime and manga Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks any sources to either meet

As you may be aware, many of the best sources for this article are in Japanese. This is unfortunate, although I'm not sure how the notability guidelines work across languages. Can something be notable in one langauge and not notable in another? I'd have thought not, although article quality might differ greatly. Quadparty (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is independent of language at least in theory, but is often difficult in practice to demonstrate and assess across language barriers (reliability of sources, depth of coverage, etc). Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 13:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Episode titles and the cast are both found in the Anime News Network website. Stop vandalizing this article. Blueshirts (talk) 03:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V: "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found featuring significant coverage of a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." Stop making FALSE accusations of vandalism. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 06:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

If you think that "the Anime News Network website" is a

WP:RS and contains this information then cite the bloody thing. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 06:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Well, it appears that it isn't a RS. Is there any reason the article shouldn't be stubified down to its opening sentence, which is the only sourced material in it (albeit sourced to IMDB, which is highly marginal at best). Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 03:19, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

Changed the genre from historical to Christian animation to match the wikipedia entry for Superbook. Also made sense to me since the Bible (New Testament in the case of Flying House) isn't considered historical text but religious text - at least in the context of an encyclopedia entry. 66.233.39.250 (talk) 09:27, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although the English dubbed version has a following in its own right, I feel that current article is too much devoted to it. Better mention more on Japanese original, as in the article on other classic anime like "Speed Racer". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.3.77.247 (talk) 19:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]