Talk:The Marina Torch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Does this article show up in Google for you?

For just "dubai torch tower", no quotes, no verbatim?

It doesn't for me, at least on the first page. #11, to be precise. Wikipedia's normally right up there for everything, if not first. Might be why there haven't been many drive-by vandals. I sort of hope me saying "dubai torch tower" doesn't help promote this article, but only sort of. Dubai torch tower. InedibleHulk (talk) 08:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We've had a lot of 'tower is torched' kinda vandals. Not sure we should be encouraging them. Secretlondon (talk) 09:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You mean firing them up? Seriously though, they could say the same about "the marina torch", right? "Dubai torch tower" gets about triple the hits. That suggests a lot of decent readers and writers are using that common name, and Wikipedia is somehow falling away. #14 today. Is there any other WP article that shows up 14th? I sure can't find it.
You might say something's...fishy. See? Anything's a pun target. No reason to hide the sum of human knowledge about this building. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We're up to #2! Only one to go. Dubai Torch Tower! InedibleHulk (talk) 05:06, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you care? Secretlondon (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No huge reason. Just the way Wikipedia articles are supposed to work in Google. It's a bit weird when they don't. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Occupancy status?

After the fire, is the building still occupied, or has it been evacuated? What plans have been announced to repair or demolish it? Reify-tech (talk) 17:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

101 apartments still down. As of two days ago, they can't return "indefinitely", but hotels are offering twenty free nights. I highly doubt demolition is a viable option, but dumber things have happened. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
the article makes it sound like the owners of the tower are offering them free accommodation, rather than a few hotel owners offering. Secretlondon (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery

The image gallery is completely indiscriminate: two of the pictures depict construction at different stages in 2007, and two of them views from the complete building at day and night. I propose one of the construction images be located to the History section, and one of the view shots somewhere in the body of the article, per

WP:IG, and the other images removed from the article (they can be accessed in Wikimedia Commons, through the link in the External links section). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Ping @Yellowdesk: – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cladding

Was the cladding flammable (like that on Grenfell Tower), and, if so, why was cheap, flammable cladding used when Dubai is such a rich country? 76.189.141.37 (talk) 03:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because Dubai is the worst city in the world. 71.93.42.17 (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Marina_Torch&oldid=1207854026"