Talk:Tom's Rhinoplasty

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Television / Computer Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group. This article is supported by the Animated television work group. This article is supported by the Computer animation work group. Comedy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Holidays This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles project's importance scale .

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television / Colorado Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group. This article is supported by American television task force. This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

What is the name of the song that plays when Wendy is reflecting on losing Stan, and you see the flashbacks and projectile vomiting?

where be the trivia —Preceding unsigned comment added by KariaRockz (talk • contribs) 05:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article pass the

See This page to discuss about the merger. --Gman124 ^talk 16:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Appears", but unless we know that these multiple studies do more than "passingly mention" the episode, we cannot know for sure.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 06:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Tom's Rhinoplasty's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "EpGuide":

• From
  ISBN 0762435615
  .
• From
  ISBN 0762435615
  .

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Tom's Rhinoplasty/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Flash ^{talk} 01:47, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yello! Saw this at GAN and I'd love to assist

• Can you come up with a better adjective then "insanely"?
  • Extremely? — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "'Tom's Rhinoplasty', the show's first Valentine's Day epiosde,[...]" -> typo
  • Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Forgot to add a quotation marker after "Species."
  • Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "Wrapped" seems a bit slang-ish, am I wrong? Perhaps, "concluded"?
  • Concluded it is. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary

• Who does Wendy suggest ideas to? Stan?
  • Correct. Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Wikilink to Kenny's page.
  • Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "Concurrently, a large group of women rampages the streets[...]" -> "[...]group of women rampage[...]"
  • Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Combine the second and third sentences in the third paragraph, please.
  • Ok. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "She also thanks Mrs. Kimball (one of the women from the group of women that chased Garrison)[...]" -> "She also thanks one of the women from the group that chased Garrison named Mrs. Kimball"
  • Ok. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm a bit confused—by "figures out what actually happened" do you mean that Wendy framed Ms. Ellen and caused her death by Iraqis? If so, it needs to be clarified.
  • Let me know if that is clearer. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Production

• It mentions Parker directed, too, but the infobox and the lead mention that the director was uncredited.
  • Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "[...]but Comedy Central censors made them change the line.[...]" -> "made Parker and Stone"
  • Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Is that bit about the Postal controversy actually a "production" note?
  • Moved to Reception. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "[...]in the background that looks exactly Craig Tucker[...]" -> "looks exactly like Craig Tucker"
  • Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I think some of the bits about Wendy saying "fuck" for the first time and things like it should be moved in the "Cultural references" section, though that should be renamed "Cultural references and impact"
  • Moved that bit and renamed the section. If you think other stuff should be moved to, let me know what. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "The idea featured in the script of Ms. Ellen taking one of the children to dinner for passing[...]" -> awkwardly worded there, don't you think?
  • I fixed it a bit. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Maybe you should move their surprise about fan reaction to the "Reception" section?
  • Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Theme

• There's no mention in the plot about Garrison being a model.
  • I changed the Plot summary part a bit to address it. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Nothing else here, but maybe you can expand it with some of the bits at "Cartman Gets an Anal Probe" and "Weight Gain 4000"?
  • I added a bit. Is this what you meant? — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural references

• You should rename the section to "Cultural references and impact"
  • Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• The first paragraph should be broke up a bit.
• OK. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delink to Hasselholf (already linked above)
  • Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "When Ms. Ellen asks the class the last lesson[...]" -> "asks the class about the last lesson"
  • Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

• Rename "Reception and release" (?)
  • Ok. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "[...]in a three-DVD in November 1998." -> "in a three-disc DVD" perhaps?
  • Changes to "three-disc DVD set". — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

• All 3 images are fine; the infobox image has a very weak rationale though, so can you beef it up at all? Just a passing mention of the animation process would even be suitable.
• Can you change the caption for the infobox image? It's rather....lackluster, ya know?
  • I think the new caption addresses both these concerns. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final say

here

for criteria)