Talk:Tony De Vit

	LGBT studies
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Biography: Musicians

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

England Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is way way way to much of a fluff piece... The "!" and the beginning "awe" paragraphs that are supposed to emotionally engage the reader is in no way a true Wikipedia article. This article is written like it was done by Tony's record producers. This needs to have the "Tony on a pedestal" taken out and typed up as a real unbiased article of an influential and respected DJ. Not some demigod of the club/rave underground... I'd change it but this page is protected? So Tony's record producers need to give up on the fluff piece and unprotect this so someone can make a real informative page out of it. Lame. Kledsky (talk) 10:08, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The page has not been protected since 2 June 2007. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:47, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a huge almost totally unreferenced promotional section that either needs very heavy editing for neutrality, perfectly referencing, or cutting out completely. There may also be

COPYVIO involved. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:56, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The article has an NPOV label but no objections here in Talk. In fact, this is the second edit to the talk page. Further, i've no idea why the article is protected. -- Stephen van Egmond —Preceding unsigned comment added by StephenVanEgmond (talk • contribs) 14:39, May 30, 2007 (UTC)