Talk:Treaty of Union

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United Kingdom High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. England High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Scotland High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

As I mentioned earlier, a Regius Professor Emeritus of Law wrote in the January 2008 issue of Life and Work saying that certain Articles of the Treaty or Act of Union cannot be amended by anybody, which I took to mean not even by the Parliament of the United Kingdom. In particular, the Union cannot be dissolved by anybody. This is a curious view to say the least, in light of the constitutional doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty. – Kaihsu (talk) 13:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the constitutional doctrine of

Parliamentary Sovereignty is an English concept - Scotland has long held to the idea of the people being sovereign perhaps going back to before the declaration of Arbroath in 1320. Fishiehelper2 (talk) 22:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. Still in that case, the question I raised remains outstanding. That is to say: would not a referendum (or another declaration by the People, whatever form it takes) be legally powerful enough to alter the Treaty or Act of Union insofar as the constitution in Scotland is concerned? (And correspondingly in England, an amending enactment by the Monarch-in-Parliament.) I just read the article on MacCormick v Lord Advocate. Saying that the Parliament cannot repeal or alter certain conditions in the Act is different from saying nobody can do so. Further, the leading judgment (available on Wikisource) stayed away from settling this point. Happy Saint Andrew’s Day. – Kaihsu (talk) 23:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If someone could look up the Regius professor’s letter and copy the text here, it might help our discussion. – Kaihsu (talk) 16:14, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David M Walker, Regius Professor of Law in the University of Glasgow from 1958 to 1990 (the one I mentioned earlier, I guess) wrote this: David M Walker (18 June 2007) The Union and the law. journalonline.co.uk (Law Society of Scotland). Similar questions were raised in Carl Gardner, Barrister: Challenges to the traditional doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty. – Kaihsu (talk) 18:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Treaty of Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090619224021/http://www.parliament.uk/actofunion/04_01_commissioners.html to http://www.parliament.uk/actofunion/04_01_commissioners.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090721014514/http://www.parliament.uk/actofunion/04_02_course.html to http://www.parliament.uk/actofunion/04_02_course.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/corporate/history/SPTradition/treaty.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snowded has reverted my minor edits to the page. I would like to know why he objects to my edits. AlbionChief (talk) 14:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've got a similar line running here. Please don't open multiple threads on different articles. I am not sure they are minor, I'm pretty sure they add nothing, If other editors disagree then fine but lets see if anyone wants to get involved. -----Snowded ^TALK 17:15, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one objecting to the edits, can you give me the reason why? My edits align with the content of the Treaty of Union itself. AlbionChief (talk) 18:22, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See link -----Snowded ^TALK 18:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why can you not give me a reason behind your objection to my edits? AlbionChief (talk) 18:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did - and have you ever edited under another name? This type of comment is starting to ring bells -----Snowded ^TALK 18:59, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make your objection clear? No I have not. AlbionChief (talk) 19:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]