Talk:Tummo

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buddhism Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tibet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Yoga Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yoga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yoga, Hatha yoga, Yoga as exercise and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YogaWikipedia:WikiProject YogaTemplate:WikiProject YogaYoga articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The reason given was that it's "woo", except that none of it is. The section, besides being absolutely relevant to the topic, cites sources nobody so far has complained about. So is there now a problem with the sources? If so, what? Because removing a whole chunk of the article and then citing "woo" as the reason is hardly something I can have good faith in. déhanchements (talk) 06:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any sources here would need to be

talk) 06:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

What does this page have to do with medicine? Are https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612090/ and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058244 not reliable sources? déhanchements (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Descriptions of biophysical phenomena are

talk) 20:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Wouldn't https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2002/04/meditation-dramatically-changes-body-temperatures/, which was in the section, be a secondary source by the definition laid out in

WP:MEDRS? déhanchements (talk) 02:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

No. We need something like a review article or statement from a major medical body.

talk) 03:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]