Talk:Tux3

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Linux Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Although I was not the person who removed the proposal for deletion, I will attempt to explain here why I believe it is notable.
1. The author is a well-known and respected Linux kernel developer.
2. The project is open source.
3. The proposed filesystem features rival those of ZFS and aims to establish Tux3 as a contender as a modern FS.
4. The project has received coverage from reputable sources such as LKML, Kernel Trap, etc.

If anyone believes I'm overlooking something or has a differing opinion on the matter, please let me know.

Note: For another FS with a situation similar to this one, see HAMMER
SHostetler (talk) 07:06, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only point 1 and 4 do matter, with regard to Wikipedia

talk) 09:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I've removed the cleanup-jargon. This article is about a particular filesystem and the implementation decisions its author has made. The argon words here are fundamental concepts and explained in their own articles. It is not appropriate to repeat the explanations here. Paul Foxworthy (talk) 22:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this article seem to be overflowing with drama? the bit im referring to is "At 17:59 Japan Standard Time, 17 February 2009, Linux booted from a Tux3 root filesystem for the first time in recorded history". Im sure the developers were happy that they made something that worked but its a filesystem, its nothing special. --84.66.39.3 (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]