Talk:Uniform Civil Code

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Former good article nomineeUniform Civil Code was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 22, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
June 6, 2022Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee
WikiProject iconHuman rights High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReligion Mid‑importance
WikiProject icon
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDiscrimination Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1=

POV Concerns and Tone

I have put in the POV and tone tags in response to a scan of the last paragraphs of this article which show a suspected religious and political bias which is against NPOV policy. Statements such as

"As long as the Uniform Civil Code is pursued only by the BJP and its associates (RSS and VHP), the minorities—Muslims and Christians alike—will see it as Hindu law being stuffed down their throat. "

are deceptive in that the speak for large demographics with subjective language. Furthermore, these statements do not have an encyclopediac tone.

The page was written by someone who unfortunatley reveals his pan-islamist bias. Its neutrality should be verified

What will be the condition of tribals with this bill?

A separate section should be prepared for tribals in this page. Because in India the tribals have started protesting just from its discussion. The chairman of the committee formed for this bill has also advocated keeping the tribals out of it. -- Kingdom of Khoh (talk) 05:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No uniform civil court

Bb 206.84.233.197 (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

206.84.233
197 2402:8100:2648:5FE:578:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]