Talk:United States Chamber of Commerce

The contents of the Global Innovation Policy Center page were merged into United States Chamber of Commerce on 14 January 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. 209.3.198.250 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (IP registered to US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE)

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

Archives (Index)

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 17 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cmurphy109.

Above undated message substituted from

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2018 and 6 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Oldmanmott.

Above undated message substituted from

GIPC does not appear to be notable except as part of the Chamber of Commerce. It could be dealt with in a small section or paragraph here. Apocheir (talk) 22:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. GIPC has only 4 footnotes, all of which link to its own website. PetesPizza (talk) 13:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 11:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per the request, taking my reasoning here before re-editing.

1. Opinion pieces are not citations per Wikipedia:Reliable sources
2. Conflating board member stats as a representation of total membership statistics is misleading
3. The claim about representing over 3 million businesses is cited twice - by an opinion piece. Again, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources
4. 'Strong conservative positions' (which is based on the opinion article as a citation) is wrong; this page already talks about its positions: "Politically, the US Chamber of Commerce is considered to be on the
   populists, do not support. The US Chamber is often associated with the establishment
   wing of the Republican Party."

Reverting the page to its previous, stable form before its vandalism. Thank you. Coconutshrimp (talk) 11:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines are clear: Yes we can use "opinion pieces"---

WP:REPUTABLE states: "This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors....When taking information from opinion content, the identity of the author may help determine reliability. The opinions of specialists and recognized experts are more likely to be reliable and to reflect a significant viewpoint." In this case a major news magazine has selected and verified the reliable authors. Rjensen (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

On its LINKEDIN Page the Chamber states: "The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is the world’s largest business organization representing the interests of more than three million businesses of every size, sector, and region." see https://www.linkedin.com/company/u-s--chamber-of-commerce/ Rjensen (talk) 20:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can't quote the US Chamber of Commerce as a reliable source for an article on the US Chamber of Commerce.

The group is well known for representing large global businesses.

https://www.economist.com/business/2016/07/09/the-two-faces-of-usa-inc

Many academic sources agree with this. Ilyana.Sombrelune (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence "It claims to represent over 3 million businessess although this claim is regularly contested" is far more accurate than "it represents 3 million businesses"

The former claim is an advertising, not a serious claim. Ilyana.Sombrelune (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the later ** Ilyana.Sombrelune (talk) 19:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]