Talk:WLWT

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Baseball Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Kentucky / Ohio Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky. This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance). Television: Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Article in error and changed. Avco owned the Crosley Corporation since the 1940's and only changed the name to Avco Broadcasting in the 1960's. Avco also continued to own WLW through the 1970's, when all stations were sold in a corporate restructuring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.242.218 (talk) 06:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"For about a 10-year period beginning in the early 1990s WLWT has had a high rate of chief meteorologist turnover... The average shelf life of a chief meteorologist at WLWT has been 2 to 2.5 years. The high turnover of weather talent is considered one of the primary reasons that WLWT has had difficulty gaining traction in the local TV ratings race."

Seems to be some editorializing here, who considers this a "high" turnover rate and "one of the primary reasons that WLWT has had difficulty gaining traction in the local TV ratings race"?--Eloil (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wholeheartedly concur and have adjusted the phrasing accordingly. I think it's still acceptable to state the number of forecasters (which can be garnered by simple counting) and the average tenure (which is just simple arithmetic), but drawing conclusions about ratings is

not neutral, and would need an RS showing that the rate is significantly different from that found across the industry. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:49, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 13:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WLWT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120310060749/http://www.wlwt.com/weather/19206737/media.html to http://www.wlwt.com/weather/19206737/media.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WLWT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120714002224/http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2012/07/wesh-off-bright-house-pennsylvania-station-is-substitute.html to http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2012/07/wesh-off-bright-house-pennsylvania-station-is-substitute.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect WLWT building has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 20 § WLWT building until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 08:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]