Talk:Washington State Route 308
Appearance
![]() | Washington State Route 308 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 308/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 02:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
After the Slam Dunk Contest. –TCN7JM 02:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Route description
- I don't think on is the best adjective in the first sentence. Maybe with?
Changed to with
Final verdict
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (
lists):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reliable sources):):
c (OR
- a (
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (focused):
- a (
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
- Overall: Good job! Just this one thing. –TCN7JM 02:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: