Talk:Washington State Route 530

	Washington State Route 530 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 19, 2009 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: State highways / Washington Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. state highways   Locations  Washington   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.   United States: Washington Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

While the RD should be expanded, it's got the "big four". It's eligible for C-class -

RD and History expanded. B-Class. –CG 00:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 530/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

1. "The 50.52-mile (81.30 km) long route runs northeast from an interchange with Interstate 5 in Washington (I-5)": Do not need to indicate Interstate 5 is in Washington as it is redundant. Also, a wikilink to Interstate 5 in Washington would help here.
2. Can more descriptive information about the route be added to the lead?
3. "as the name implies" is redundant.
4. " the road aligns itself northeast" sounds awkward.
5. "In Trafton, which is located in Arlington Heights, SR 530 passes a road that leads to the Jim Creek Naval Radio Station, a United States Navy facility; from Trafton, the road crosses a railroad track used by the BNSF Railway before crossing the North Fork of the Stillaguamish River in Cicero." should be broken into two sentences.
6. "the North Fork" sounds colliqual.
7. Shouldn't the information about the traffic counts at the I-5 interchange be mentioned earlier in the route description?
8. Do not use "then" in describing progression of route.
9. The sentence "The road then turned south to parallel railroad tracks belonging to the Great Northern Railroad and the South Fork of the Skagit River to Milltown, where SR 530 intersected Milltown Road, which would later interchange with I-5 to the east." sounds wordy.
10. "The highway exited North Stanwood to enter Stanwood and intersected SR 532." should be rephrased to "The highway exited North Stanwood to enter Stanwood, where it intersected SR 532."
11. Can more information about the physical surroundings the route passes through (i.e. woods, residential areas) be added to the route description?
12. The sentence "A 1911 map shows a road from Conway traveled south to Stanwood and east past Arlington towards Oso and Darrington." sounds awkward.
13. Dates should not be wikilinked.
14. "which the highway follows" sounds redundant.
15. "construction crews unearth remains", "unearth" should be "unearthed".
16. I noticed a good deal of the recent history describes minor construction projects. We had a problem with this in the ACR of Washington State Route 31. Can you remove all the non-notable projects?

I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • Done –CG 17:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 17:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081007133100/http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR530/DarringtonEmergencyRepairs/ to http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR530/DarringtonEmergencyRepairs/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121004165528/http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR530/DarringtonEmergencyRepairs/map.htm to http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR530/DarringtonEmergencyRepairs/map.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090501175417/http://www.wsdot.wa.gov:80/projects/sr530/saukriverrealignment/ to http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR530/SaukRiverRealignment/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121004171344/http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR530/SaukRiverRealignment/Map.htm to http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR530/SaukRiverRealignment/Map.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081118232617/http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/News/2008/09/23-530SaukRiverRealignment.htm to http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/News/2008/09/23-530SaukRiverRealignment.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified 3 external links on Washington State Route 530. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080410164014/http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/TDO/PDF_and_ZIP_Files/HwyLog2006.pdf to http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/TDO/PDF_and_ZIP_Files/HwyLog2006.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326014935/http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/tdo/PDF_and_ZIP_Files/Annual_Traffic_Report_2007.pdf to http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/tdo/PDF_and_ZIP_Files/Annual_Traffic_Report_2007.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR530/DarringtonEmergencyRepairs/map.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]