Talk:Wayne Thiebaud

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles University of California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Smithsonian Institution: Archives of American Art Low‑importance This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Archives of American Art. United States: Arizona Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

boo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.203.157 (talk) 14:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

he is an amazing painter because he draws sweets! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.101.56 (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a treat to look at. Wish more would follow the example. Death to the cobalt blue default! Coat of Many Colours (talk) 02:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See

List of colors...Modernist (talk) 11:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

• Wayne Thiebaude.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ewulp Citizenship and place of birth should always be accurate and nuetral. The Americas is 2 massive continents. Using America one country is simply imperial US bias and is considered annoying to offensive to everyone/every place in Central, and South America. Not sure how Canadians feel. There's nothing in your link for style and standardization on US v American. The simple fact is it is less accurate to use American and far less biased. The only point that could be made is that all of wikipedia needs to be updated on this, and I'd be willing to make that case. Hesperian Nguyen (talk)

The link (

Cesar Estrada Chavez are described as "American", which demonstrates that this is considered proper WP form. It is the usual adjective for US citizens, and Wikipedia follows sources and avoids bizarre usage. This ngram gives an idea of just how unusual it is for anybody to be described as a "US artist".Ewulp (talk) 23:33, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Certainly popularity isn't the best way to decide anything! It (US) remains more correct and less offensive and annoying to the 625 million people living in Latin America. The propriety you speak of is emanating from the US. And while you feel US is awkward in English, the correct equivalent in Spanish is United Stateser. I don't want to propose entirely new words, so perhaps a compromise could be to leave nationality as US? Further, the American already redirects to United States there, further suggesting the difference between accuracy and the vulgarity! Hesperian Nguyen (talk)

Many things in Wikipedia are decided by determining what is most common in reliable sources. "American" is the

WP:PLACE says to "avoid arguments about what a place ought to be called, instead asking the less contentious question, what it is called"). The use of "American" has been discussed repeatedly at Talk:American. An interesting comment there [1] from Canadian editor Prof.rick: "The origin of the problem rests in the naming of a nation thru the borrowing of the name of its continent and hemisphere ... we sometimes smile, or even pity the people of the United States because they don't otherwise have a name by which to refer to themselves! (United Stations?)" Ewulp (talk) 01:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

I think I already acknowledged all of that. I'll take it to the discussion as the term is considered politically incorrect at the least and offensive at worst. My point on nationality in the infobox? Hesperian Nguyen (talk)

Thinking about what you last wrote... Common understanding cannot be the basis for the use of a word in an encyclopedia. Clearly the word 'Paki' is understood throughout the UK and Ireland and is used commonly, yet it doesn't make it any less offensive for some/most/all Pakistanis. A less inflammatory example might be the use of Blacks v. African Americans. Blacks is also "so commonly understood as such by English-speaking people everywhere", yet undeniably African-American is considered a better choice in official documents or encyclopedic entries. Hesperian Nguyen (talk)

Slurs and profanity are not the norm in scholarly sources, so they're deprecated here, but "American" is not a slur. Any dictionary will tell you that "Paki" is a derogatory term,[2] but Americans are fine with calling themselves Americans.[3] If African-American is preferred to Black in Wikipedia, it's because it's the preferred term in scholarly sources. Wikipedia is not the vanguard of language change; we follow our sources. I'm surprised that you approve of the term African-American, as it contains "American" – shouldn't you be arguing for "Afro-US"? Ewulp (talk) 02:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lol African-American applies to all of the Americas. And the use of American by Americans is really a giant imperial blind spot because that usage is offensive to every one else in the two continents. The point... which you kind of got... is to do the right thing. You also continue to ignore my concrete improvement to this page, so I'll go ahead and do it since it's more accurate and less offensive. Hesperian Nguyen (talk)

This decision should not be made just between the two of you. It appears to be norm in artist biography articles to use the term "American" to refer to nationality. See notable artists' pages such as John Trumbull (B-class), Thomas Eakins (B-class), Georgia O'Keeffe (B-class), Jasper Johns (B-class), Roy Lichtenstein, and Cy Twombly. I have yet to find an artist biography article that uses the term "US" to refer to the artist's nationality. The decision made here must be executed with consistency, and such a decision impacting so many articles cannot be a discussion between two users on a single artist's talk page. As of now, we must remain consistent among biography articles and thus keep the nationality as "American". GeneralPoxter (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency that is inaccurate and casual. Have a look at your passport or Wayne's and what does it say? I have no problem with changing all of those. Hesperian Nguyen (talk)

My father, who is an artist, heard from friends that Wayne has passed. This is just hearsay for now, so I won’t edit the article. Just wanted to put the information here Malnu (talk) 17:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]