Talk:Wikispaces

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 August 2006. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

Seeing that this article was deleted on

Wikispaces is closing later this year. Should we change this page to past tense now or add a “Defunct” date if that has not been done already? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.26.39 (talk) 18:19, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While I would tend to agree with DPLBot, encountering "Glogs" in the article was almost stammering or derailing my thought process. No idea what it meant until I found the meaning on the Disambig article. I'm not advocating for a new article on Glog but also reluctant to remove the wikilink to the Glog disambig. Not that DPLBot wants me to revert my link, just noting for future reference. .digamma (talk) 23:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]