While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fiji, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fiji on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FijiWikipedia:WikiProject FijiTemplate:WikiProject FijiFiji articles
user-generated content, then it wouldn't be acceptable for Wikipedia. --Marchjuly (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
@Marchjuly: Thanks for justifying the removal of the Vatanitawake Archaeological report, however, I cannot help but observe the inconsistencies of certain Wikipedia editors. What about the removal of the newspaper- Fiji Times article of Nov 13th, 1985 on the installation of Fiji's highest traditional title of Roko Tui Bau on the late Ratu Joni Madraiwiwi in Bau. The Fiji Times article included the photo of the then Minister for Fijian Affairs, Adi Samanunu Cakobau and the then Ra Province Member of Parliament and Gonesau -Dr Ratu Wilisoni Tuiketei Malani's inside the traditional Vatanitawake temple? My point is that the Vatanitawake Archaelogical Report which contained the details (on pg 103) of the Ancient Monarchy of Fiji- Tui Viti sacred stone title or Tawake being kept at the foundation of the Vatanitawake sacred temple by Vueti, the 1st Roko Tui Bau and the Nov 13th, 1985 -Fiji Times article on how Ratu Wilisoni Tuiketei Malani as the original eldest lineage (Gonesau) of Vueti, the 1st Roko Tui Bau and the Ancient Monarchy of Fiji- Tui Viti. It is important to report such authority/approval/endorsement/etc. so that wikipedia readers, especially the younger generation of Fiji will understand the logic behind ancient traditional authority and protocols that were not reported well (not accurately) by Fiji's main stream media as well as early Christian missionaries during Ratu Cakobau's time. Fiji historians and missionaries have reported that the title of the Monarchy of Fiji-Tui Viti were self styled in the mid 1800s by Ratu Cakobau or his father Ratu Tanoa, which is incorrect. The Monarchy of Fiji or Tui Viti title was and is still a genuine traditional title and descendants are still alive today. Fiji is currently under a lot of political and economical challenges with significant external forces that continue to support miscommunication and suppression of ancient traditional authorities and the rule of law. There were reasons for the ancient traditional lineage to support the latter traditional authority but recently, this support has become more abused.The right has become more wrong and the wrong has become more right with abuse of power, corruption, suppression and injustices. I would have thought that my contributions to wikipedia would have contributed to my intentions to correct the miscommunications, that are politically and commercially motivated but frustratingly, the editing rules and the inconsistent editors have convinced my heart to move away. This will be my last contribution to wikipedia. I say this with a good heart as I do not want to be a point of continued disagreements with fellow wikipedia editors. Saqiwa (talk) 05:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia article content is really only intended to reflect is written in
Wikia, which work similar to Wikipedia, but which don't have as many or as restrictive policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:20, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
@
administrator being asked to take a look at things and take action if necessary. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
@Marchjuly: Thanks for the guidance.I will make the necessary actions. Saqiwa (talk) 07:32, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
