Talk:William Vitarelli
US Supreme Court case about his alleged associations with the Communist Party USA ? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:William Vitarelli/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 18:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (lists):
- The lead will benefit from a small expansion in order to summarise the article
" While on Saipan" - don't you mean 'in'?Just figured it's an island
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reliable sources): c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This article meets the criteria, so I'll pass it outright. It is well written and comprehensive for the subject, hence why I found no issues with it. JAGUAR 19:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)