Talk:Writers Guild of America Awards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Structure

The structure here seems to be that you have one overall heading for this award ceremony and then a page listing each year's winners. I'm thinkin the daytime serial winners should be moved to the years in which they won.

That will make this article pretty short but maybe we can add some history of the event or other details.

Any objections? DirectRevelation 15:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)DirectRevelation[reply]

History

If founded in 1949, this was probably called the "Screenwriters Guild of America Award" I'm researching further. DirectRevelation 23:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)DirectRevelation[reply]

Writers' Guild of Great Britain Award

There is a Writers Guild in Great Britain too and an award. Salman Rushdie won the price in the Eighties. We in Europe think of the Writers' Guild of Great Britain in the same way as of the Writers Guild in the USA and it seems to us as important as the latter one. Is this English Wikipedia a thing done by Americans for Americans? Well, this is my impression. You know, this ambiguity thing, it is not there where it belongs. I do not want to be misinterpreted, I do not think the Americans are not as important as British people ... ;) --13Peewit (talk) 08:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have a photo of the award they can put in the Creative Commons?

The WGA Award that is given to the winners is a very striking piece of sculpture. Here is what it looks like: http://press.wgaw.org/photos/Awards/WGA%20Awards%20Logos/WGA%20Statuette%20Photo.jpg

We have a photo in Wikipedia of what the Academy Award statuette looks like on the Academy Award page at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award

Does anyone have a photo of a Writer's Guild Award or know where we can get one that they can put into the Creative Commons so it can go on the WGA Awards page?

I've already looked for one on Flickr and there isn't one in the Creative Commons. Maybe somebody knows a writer who has won a WGA award that will let us take a picture and put on Wikimedia.

Best Regards, Hugh Pickens 96.18.48.118 (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on

Talk:Golden Globe Award which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

WGA Awards topic coordination

I'm getting started with this. There is a few things I need to do first though which is post it to all the relevant talk pages. I'll be using

AWB for that, so it will be done semi-automatically. –MJLTalk 18:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

If there is no objection, I will place {{WGA Awards topic coordination}} on the following pages: Special:Diff/902566915. –MJLTalk 18:11, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@RAHJY: What say you?MJLTalk 18:20, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What is this all about?-
WP:WAWARD) 15:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
@TonyTheTiger: I'm trying to standardize our coverage of the WGA Awards. There are a few problems I could use help tackling. The to do list is up now, but I don't know where I should start tbh. –MJLTalk 16:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WAWARD) 15:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
@TonyTheTiger: {{WGA Awards topic coordination}} / Talk:Writers Guild of America Award/to doMJLTalk 16:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WAWARD) 04:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
@TonyTheTiger: You don't see the To do list? –MJLTalk 05:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WAWARD) 20:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Requested move 24 July 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 23:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Writers Guild of America Award → Writers Guild of America Awards – Just like the page for the Academy Awards, I think it's time to rename this page to its plural form. It's not a page about the award (singular), but about the award ceremony (ie. the awards- plural).. Cheers! –MJLTalk 21:10, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

It's worth pointing out that recently the Golden Globe Awards was moved for similar reasons. Looks like consensus has started to change since 2014. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯MJLTalk 21:16, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a . No further edits should be made to this section.

RFC: The Layout & Colors of the WGA Awards

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


What should the standard color and layout for pages about the WGA Awards be? –MJLTalk 20:08, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Background

As shown

WP:AWB
upon the conclusion of this RFC in order to do basic fixes, but I would like to fix the formatting issues at the same time. I am proposing this RFC because this will effect 72+ pages which have remained mostly stable for a few years.

Questions
  • Question 1. What color should we use to represent the WGA Awards?
  1.   This golden color
  2.   This blue-gray color
  3.   This bronze color
Note: Unless there is objection, the infobox/div, templates, and tables of all pages will be matched this one color.
  • Question 2. (a) Should pages use a floating div or an infobox? (b) What information should either of these options include?

Remember this is

not a vote, and this will probably only get halfway decent results if we engage in a true discussion since there are so many options for how this can go down. –MJLTalk 20:08, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Discussion

I have never felt so alone while on en.wiki... –MJLTalk 02:52, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.